<corpus lang='english'>
<lexelt item="art.n">
<instance id="art.40003" docsrc="bnc_a04_1181">
<answer instance="art.40003" senseid="pop_art~1:06:00::"/>
<context>
whatever flickerings of potential this young tyro possesses, they cannot cover up the fact that he is a painter with the imagination of a retarded adolescent; no technical mastery; no intuitive feeling for pictorial space; no sensitivity towards, or grasp of, tradition; and a colour sense rather less than that of congo, the chimpanzee who was taught (among other things) a crude responsiveness to colour harmonies by desmond morris in the late 1950s. however, potentially educable as a painter schnabel may or may not be, his work is just not worthy of serious attention by anyone with a developed taste in this particular art form. readers need also to be wary of the existence of special markets. the explosive prices for teddy bears in the last few years indicate how a market can be created, in this case by a mix of merit and nostalgia. what is clearly a dealers' market is often signalled by the invention of a brand name to group together a variety of material, perhaps rather disparate. pop <head>art</head>is an example. 
</context>
</instance>
<instance id="art.40006" docsrc="bnc_am9_797">
<answer instance="art.40006" senseid="arts~1:09:00::"/>
<context>
special provisions will also ensure that those on modest incomes most of which comes from investments, such as people who have been made redundant, do not pay this 9% on their savings. widening horizons: investing in the arts the arts benefit society in two ways. first, access to the arts is intrinsic to a high quality of life. second, the cultural sector the arts, crafts, design, and audiovisual industries makes as great a net contribution to the economy as does the oil industry. we will: create a new ministry of arts and communications headed by a minister in the cabinet. liberal democrats will raise investment in the arts to the ec average over five years. reform and decentralise <head>arts</head>funding and organisation . 
</context>
</instance>
<instance id="art.40010" docsrc="bnc_aha_533">
<answer instance="art.40010" senseid="art~1:06:00::"/>
<context>
it is fair to say that nothing frank has achieved as a filmmaker approaches the heights he scaled with the americans. the 50minute film he made for arena suggests why: last supper frank on frank looks like a parody of the excesses of sixties avantgarde filmmaking. on an empty lot between two harlem streets, a group of people arrive for an outdoor party to celebrate the new publication of an unnamed author. initially they make respectful smalltalk about him, but their comments grow increasingly resentful as it becomes apparent he will not show up. some events in last supper appear roughly improvised. yet hefty chunks of dialogue are obviously and rather archly staged. people say things like: you ever notice how all <head>art</head>focuses on people in trouble? 
</context>
</instance>
</lexelt>
</corpus>
