Internet-Draft Limiting Derivative Works Restrictions t July 2026
Sayre & Carpenter Expires 24 January 2027 [Page]
Workgroup:
Network Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-sayre-gendispatch-derivative-03
Updates:
5378 (if approved)
Published:
Intended Status:
Best Current Practice
Expires:
Authors:
R. Sayre
B. E. Carpenter
Univ. of Auckland

Limiting Derivative Works Restrictions to IETF Documents

Abstract

This document clarifies that only IETF Documents may contain legal limitations on derivative works.

About This Document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sayre-gendispatch-derivative/.

Discussion of this document takes place on the ipr-wg Working Group mailing list (mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipr-wg/. Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg/.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 24 January 2027.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

This document updates Rights Contributors Provide to the IETF Trust [RFC5378] in order to clarify and limit which contributions may include a restriction on derivative rights.

2. Conventions and Definitions

This document uses the terminology defined in [RFC5378].

3. Derivative Works

There is an expansive definition of "Contribution" in [RFC5378]. There is also a mechanism formally defined in Section 5.3 of that RFC that allows a Contributor to limit the right to produce derivative works. As written, this optional mechanism could be construed as applying to all Contributions. Using this mechanism outside of specifications, for example, in electronic mail, makes it difficult for people to respond and inhibits collaboration. This behavior impedes the very idea of collaborating about the Internet over the Internet. The IESG has stated [IESG-DERIV] that derivative works limitations should only be applied to IETF Documents as defined in [RFC5378].

This document formally restricts the use of this mechanism to IETF Documents, i.e., RFCs or Internet-Drafts that are used in the IETF Standards Process. Derivative works restrictions may not be applied to other Contributions, such as public online IETF fora as defined in [RFC9945], appeals, minutes, or audio or video recordings of IETF meetings.

All other rights Contributors provide to the IETF Trust/ICMP [RFC5378] remain in place.

4. Security Considerations

This document has no direct impact on Internet security.

5. IANA Considerations

This document has no IANA actions.

6. References

6.1. Normative References

[RFC5378]
Bradner, S., Ed. and J. Contreras, Ed., "Rights Contributors Provide to the IETF Trust", BCP 78, RFC 5378, DOI 10.17487/RFC5378, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5378>.
[RFC9945]
Eggert, L., Ed. and E. Lear, Ed., "IETF Community Moderation", BCP 245, RFC 9945, DOI 10.17487/RFC9945, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9945>.

6.2. Informative References

[IESG-DERIV]
IESG, "IESG Statement on Clarifying Derivative Works Rights", , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-derivative-works-rights/>.

Authors' Addresses

Robert Sayre
San Francisco, CA
United States of America
Brian E. Carpenter
The University of Auckland
School of Computer Science
The University of Auckland
PB 92019
Auckland 1142
New Zealand