Network Working Group A. Huang Feng Internet-Draft P. Francois Updates: RFC7950 RFC7951 RFC9254 (if approved) INSA-Lyon Intended status: Standards Track T. Graf Expires: 22 April 2025 Swisscom B. Claise Huawei 19 October 2024 Extensible YANG model for YANG-Push Notifications draft-netana-netconf-notif-envelope-00 Abstract This document defines a new extensible notification structure, defined in YANG, for use in YANG-Push Notification messages enabling any YANG compatible encodings such as XML, JSON or CBOR. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 22 April 2025. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 1] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Relationship to past documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1. Relationship to RFC5277 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2. Relationship to RFC8639 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.3. Relationship to RFC7950 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.4. Relationship to RFC7951 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.5. Relationship to RFC9254 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1. Enabling the Notification Envelope . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2. Discovering the support of this model . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.3. Notification Envelope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.4. Extensions for the Notification Envelope . . . . . . . . 12 4. Operational Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5.1. YANG Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5.2. YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 7.1. URI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 7.2. YANG module name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 7.3. YANG SID-file . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Appendix A. .sid file . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 1. Introduction YANG-Push [RFC8639] allows publishers to send notifications to a data collection. The YANG-Push receiver decodes the message and optionally validates the header and the content before forwarding to the next process. Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 2] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 The notification container from YANG-Push is currently based on the XML model from NETCONF Event Notifications [RFC5277]. This model has the drawback that only a single mandatory "eventTime" leaf is defined and does offer a way to extend this header with new metadata. Additionally, this XML model is only valid for XML-based environments. When messages are encoded in other YANG encodings, such as JSON [RFC7951] or CBOR [RFC9254], validators cannot use YANG to validate the message schema. YANG data consumer receiving notifications require additional metadata to understand the full context of the received message. For example, in addition to the timestamp of when the event was encoded, it is also important to know the hostname which sourced the message, and have sequence numbers in generated messages so that lost notification messages can be detected. This additional metadata is also helpful to correlate the data with other sources of Network Telemetry [RFC9232] information. For such reasons, this document proposes the following: * First, it provides an extensible YANG notification header allowing implementors and IETF contributors to easily add new metadata to the notification message. * Second, it provides the first crucial extensions enabling operators to identify which network node publishes which YANG-Push messages and when the events or metrics were observed on the network node. * And finally, it provides a way to enable and disable these extensions on a subscription basis, making the coexistence of different YANG-Push and NETCONF Event Notification [RFC5277] possible. 1.1. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. The terms "subscriber", "publisher", and "receiver" are used as defined in [RFC8639]. The terms "client" is used as defined in [RFC6241] for NETCONF and [RFC8040] for RESTCONF. Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 3] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 The terms "implementation-time information" and "runtime information" are used as defined in [RFC9196]. 2. Relationship to past documents This section shows the relationship to [RFC5277], [RFC8639], [RFC7951] and [RFC9254]. 2.1. Relationship to RFC5277 [RFC5277] defines a mechanism for NETCONF nodes to send notifications to a collector. These are the key relationships between the current document and [RFC5277]: * This document does not change the header defined by [RFC5277] nor update any behavior defined in [RFC5277]. Implementations of [RFC5277] use the header defined in Section 2.2.1 of [RFC5277]. * The co-existance of the notification model defined in [RFC5277] and the model defined in the current document is possible. The co-existence is discussed in Section 4. 2.2. Relationship to RFC8639 Subscribed Notifications [RFC8639] defines a mechanism on top of [RFC5277] to stream notifications from the NETCONF node. These are the key relationships between the current document and [RFC8639]: * Section 1.4 of [RFC8639] states that the the solution uses the notification header defined in [RFC5277]. This document proposes a new header, which clients can enable and replace the previously [RFC5277] defined. When this new header is used, notification messages are encoded as defined in Section Section 3.3. * Section 2.4.2 of [RFC8639] defines how a YANG-Push subscription is defined via an the 'establish-subscription' RPC. This document extends the RPCs from Subscribed Notifications [RFC8639] to support enabling the new header defined in this document. 2.3. Relationship to RFC7950 [RFC7950] defines how YANG data is encoded in XML. These are the key relationship points between the current document and [RFC7950]: Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 4] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 * Section 7.16.2 of [RFC7950] defines the XML encoding of YANG notification. This document defines a new header for such notifications. When a YANG-Push publisher implements the specifications in this document with the XML encoding, the notifications are encoded according to Section 3.3.2.1 in this document. 2.4. Relationship to RFC7951 [RFC7951] defines how YANG data is encoded using JSON. These are the key relationship points between the current document and [RFC7951]: * [RFC7951] does not define explicitly how a YANG notification should be encoded using JSON encoding. This document specifies a new header for such notifications. When a YANG-Push publisher implements the specifications in this document with JSON encoding, the notifications are encoded according to Section 3.3.2.2 in this document. 2.5. Relationship to RFC9254 [RFC9254] defines how YANG data is encoded using CBOR. These are the key relationship points between the current document and [RFC9254]: * [RFC9254] does not define explicitly how a YANG notification should be encoded using CBOR encoding. When a YANG-Push publisher implements the specifications in this document in CBOR encoding, the notifications are encoded according to Section 3.3.2.3 in this document. 3. Solution Section 4.2.10 of [RFC7950] defines the encoding of YANG notifications. A notification is created by defining a 'notification' statement in the YANG module. When a NETCONF server sends this notification, it is composed of two parts: a header containing metadata which encapsulates the content and the content defined by the 'notification' statement. In YANG 1.1 [RFC7950], the notification header is based on the model defined in [RFC5277] which contains a single metadata 'eventTime' leaf. An example extracted from [RFC7950] is shown in the following XML: Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 5] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 2007-09-01T10:00:00Z so-1/2/3.0 up down This document defines a new notification header and enables extending it with new metadata. The notification header defined in the following sections is to be used in YANG-Push [RFC8641] environments and can be implemented with NETCONF [RFC6241] and RESTCONF [RFC8040]. Section 3.1 defines how a client enables the header defined in this document. Section 3.2 extends the model from [RFC9196] to enable clients to discover the capability of using the new notification header for both implementation-time information and runtime information. Lastly, Section 3.3.2 defines the new notification header and how it is encoded using XML, JSON and CBOR. 3.1. Enabling the Notification Envelope The use of the notification envelope defined in this document can be enabled during the configuration of a YANG-Push subscription. This document augments the "ietf-subscribed-notification" model [RFC8639] to support the configuration of "notification-envelope". module: ietf-notification-container augment /sn:subscriptions/sn:subscription: +--rw enable-notification-envelope? boolean {notification-envelope}? +--rw metadata augment /sn:establish-subscription/sn:input: +---w enable-notification-envelope? boolean {notification-envelope}? +---w metadata augment /sn:modify-subscription/sn:input: +---w enable-notification-envelope? boolean {notification-envelope}? +---w metadata When the node 'enable-notification-envelope' is set to true, the notifications published by a YANG-Push publisher MUST use the header defined in Section 3.3.1. If any metadata is enabled during the configuration of the subscription, the metadata nodes MUST be present in the header. Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 6] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 3.2. Discovering the support of this model A client can discover the support of 'notification-envelope' model through the capabilities model defined in [RFC9196]. This documents extends the 'ietf-notification-capabilities' model with a container that includes: * A leaf 'notification-envelope', stating that the YANG notification can be encoded following the notification-envelope model. * A container 'metadata' containing all the supported extensions to this header. The YANG model defined in Section 5 augments the 'ietf-notification- capabilities' model with the leaf and container listed above. augment /sysc:system-capabilities/notc:subscription-capabilities: +--ro notification-metadata +--ro notification-envelope? boolean {notification-envelope}? +--ro metadata This model can be retrieved via a NETCONF RPC. 3.3. Notification Envelope This section defines how YANG notifications are structured when the notification envelope is enabled on a YANG-Push subscription. The following sections define how this model is encoded in XML, JSON and CBOR. 3.3.1. Base Notification Model When a YANG-Push publisher uses the notification model defined in this document, the notification is structured as follows: * The notification is encapsulated in a root "envelope" container. * The header of the notification contains the metadata that is enabled during the configuration of the subscription as a child nodes of the root "notification-envelope" container. * The content of the notification defined by the 'notification' statement is encoded in the 'notification-contents' leaf. The following YANG tree [RFC8340] illustrates the notification envelope containing the mandatory metadata 'event-time'. See Section 3.4 for more detail on the optional metadata. Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 7] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 notifications: +---n envelope +--ro event-time yang:date-and-time +--ro notification-contents? 3.3.2. Encoding of the Notification model The YANG notification can be encoded using XML [W3C.REC-xml-20001006][RFC7951], JSON [RFC7951] and CBOR [RFC9254]. 3.3.2.1. XML encoding A YANG notification encoded in XML is structured as a root "envelope" container. The namespace of this container is the namespace defined in the YANG module "ietf-yp-notification": urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:2.0 Two mandatory child nodes within the "envelope" container are expected, representing the event time and the notification payload. The "event-time" node is defined within the same XML namespace as the "envelope" container. The "event-time" node MUST be compliant with [RFC3339]. Other metadata defined within the YANG module defined in Section 5 MUST use the same XML namespace. See Section 3.4 for more details. When other metadata is enabled through configuration, the supplementary nodes are encoded at the same level of the mandatory "event-time" node and use the XML namespace defined in the YANG module. The content of the notification that is defined by the 'notification' statement is encoded in the "notification-contents" node. The name and namespace of this payload element are determined by the YANG module containing the 'notification' statement representing the notification message. The following example shows a "push-update" notification defined in the YANG module of YANG-Push [RFC8641] encoded in XML: Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 8] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 2024-10-10T10:59:55.32Z 1011 eth0 up Figure 1: XML-encoded notification 3.3.2.2. JSON Encoding A YANG notification encoded in JSON is structured as a root "envelope" container. The namespace of this container is the name of the YANG module "ietf-yp-notification" defined in Section 5. Two mandatory child nodes within the "ietf-notification:envelope" container are expected, representing the event time and the notification payload. The "event-time" node is defined within the same namespace as the "ietf-yp-notification:envelope" container and is compliant with [RFC3339]. Other metadata defined within the YANG module defined in Section 5 MUST use the same namespace "ietf-yp- notification". When other metadata is enabled through configuration, the supplementary nodes are encoded at the same level of the mandatory 'event-time' node and use the YANG module name as its namespace. See Section 3.4 for more details. The content of the notification that is defined by the 'notification' statement is encoded in the "notification-contents" node. The name and namespace of this payload element are determined by the YANG module containing the 'notification' statement representing the notification message. The following example shows a "push-update" notification defined in the YANG module of YANG-Push [RFC8641] encoded in JSON: Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 9] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 { "ietf-yp-notification:envelope": { "event-time": "2024-10-10T08:00:11.22Z", "notification-contents": { "ietf-yang-push:push-update": { "id": 1011, "datastore-contents": { "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [ { "interface": { "name": "eth0", "oper-status": "up" } } ] } } } } } Figure 2: JSON-encoded notification 3.3.2.3. CBOR Encoding YANG notifications can be encoded in CBOR using Names or SIDs in keys. Notifications encoded using names is similar to JSON encoding as defined in Section 3.3 of [RFC9254]. The key of the element can be the name of the element itself or be namespace-qualified. In the latter case, the namespace of the notification container uses the YANG module name "ietf-yp-notification" defined in Section 5. Notification encoded using YANG-SIDs replaces the names of the keys of the CBOR encoded message for a 63 bit unsigned integer. In this case, the keys of the encoded data use the SID value as defined in Section 3.2 of [RFC9254]. A SID allocation process is needed beforehand following [I-D.ietf-core-sid]. In the notification, two mandatory child nodes within the "ietf-yp- notification:envelope" container are expected, representing the event time and the notification payload. The "event-time" node is defined within the same namespace as the "ietf-yp-notification:envelope" container and is compliant with [RFC3339]. Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 10] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 When other metadata is enabled through configuration, the supplementary nodes are encoded at the same level of the mandatory "event-time" node and use the YANG module name as its namespace when they are encoded as names. When they are encoded using YANG SIDs, a SID value assigned to the metadata node is used. See Section 3.4 for more details. The content of the notification that is defined by the 'notification' statement is encoded in the "notification-contents" node. The name and namespace of this payload element are determined by the YANG module containing the 'notification' statement representing the notification message. Similarly, SIDs can be used as keys if they are well allocated. Figure 3 shows a "push-update" notification defined in the YANG module of YANG-Push [RFC8641] encoded in CBOR using names as keys. The example uses the CBOR diagnostic notation as defined in section 3.1 of [RFC9254]: { "ietf-yp-notification:envelope": { "event-time": "2024-10-10T08:00:11.22Z", "notification-contents": { "ietf-yang-push:push-update": { "id": 1011, "datastore-contents": { "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [ { "interface": { "name": "eth0", "oper-status": "up" } } ] } } } } } Figure 3: CBOR-encoded notification using diagnostic notation And Figure 4 shows the same notifcation encoded using SIDs: Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 11] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 { 2551: { 1: "2024-10-10T08:00:11.22Z", 4: { "ietf-yang-push:push-update": { "id": 1011, "datastore-contents": { "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [ { "interface": { "name": "eth0", "oper-status": "up" } } ] } } } } } Figure 4: CBOR-encoded notification using YANG SIDs in CBOR diagnostic notation 3.4. Extensions for the Notification Envelope This section described two optional YANG notification header extensions which are enabled by default when the notification envelope is enabled. When the envelope is enabled using the "enable- notification-envelope" node, the publisher includes by default the "hostname" and "sequence-number" defined in the following sections. The client discovers the support of these two extension headers with the mechanism defined in Section 3.2. This document defines the following metadata as shown in the following YANG tree [RFC8340]. See the following sections for more details. notifications: +---n envelope +--ro event-time yang:date-and-time +--ro hostname? inet:host | {notification-hostname-sequence-number}? +--ro sequence-number? yang:counter32 | {notification-hostname-sequence-number}? +--ro notification-contents? Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 12] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 3.4.1. Support of Hostname and Sequencing in YANG Notifications When YANG-Push notification messages are forwarded from a receiver to another system, such as a message broker or a time series database, the transport context is lost since it is not part of the metadata of the notification container. Therefore, the downstream system is unable to associate the message to the publishing process (the exporting network node), nor able to detect message loss or reordering. To correlate network data among different Network Telemetry planes as described in Section 3.1 of [RFC9232] or among different YANG-Push subscription types as defined in Section 3.1 of [RFC8641], a reference to the node streaming the data is needed. This is essential for understanding the timely relationship among these different planes and YANG-Push subscription types. Today, network operators work around this impediment by preserving the transport source IP address and sequence numbers of the publishing process. However, this implies encoding this information in the YANG-Push notification messages which impacts the semantic readability of the message in the downstream system. On top of that, the transport source IP address might not represent the management IP address by which the YANG-Push publisher should be known. In other terms, the source-host [RFC6470], which is the "Address of the remote host for the session" might not be the management IP address. To overcome these issues, this document proposes a notification container extension with a hostname and a sequence number. This allows the downstream system to not only be able to identify from which network node, subscription, and time the message was published but also, the order of the published messages. hostname: Describes the node's hostname according to the 'sysName' object definition in [RFC1213] from where the message was published from. This value is usually configured on the node by the administrator to uniquely identify the node in the network. sequence-number: Generates a unique sequence number for each published message by the publisher process. The number counts up at every published notification message as described in [RFC9187]. Figure 5 provides an example of a JSON encoded, [RFC8259], "push- update" notification message with hostname and sequence-number as extension. Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 13] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 ========== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per RFC 8792) =========== { "ietf-yp-notification:envelope": { "event-time": "2023-03-25T08:30:11.22Z", "hostname": "example-router", "sequence-number": 1, "notification-contents": { "ietf-yang-push:push-update": { "id": 6666, "datastore-contents": { "ietf-interfaces:interfaces": [ { "interface": { "name": "eth0", "type": "iana-if-type:ethernetCsmacd", "oper-status": "up", "mtu": 1500 } } ] } } } } } Figure 5: JSON Example for a push-update notification message 4. Operational Considerations TBD: explain co-existence with RFC5277 5. YANG Module 5.1. YANG Tree Diagram This YANG module extends "ietf-subscribed-notifications" [RFC8641] and "ietf-notification-capabilities" [RFC9196] as shown in the following YANG tree [RFC8340]: Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 14] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 module: ietf-yp-notification augment /sn:subscriptions/sn:subscription: +--rw enable-notification-envelope? boolean | {notification-envelope}? +--rw metadata +--rw hostname-sequence-number? boolean {notification-hostname-sequence-number}? augment /sn:establish-subscription/sn:input: +---w enable-notification-envelope? boolean | {notification-envelope}? +---w metadata +---w hostname-sequence-number? boolean {notification-hostname-sequence-number}? augment /sn:modify-subscription/sn:input: +---w enable-notification-envelope? boolean | {notification-envelope}? +---w metadata +---w hostname-sequence-number? boolean {notification-hostname-sequence-number}? augment /sysc:system-capabilities/notc:subscription-capabilities: +--ro notification-metadata +--ro notification-envelope? boolean | {notification-envelope}? +--ro metadata +--ro hostname-sequence-number? boolean {notification-hostname-sequence-number}? notifications: +---n envelope +--ro event-time yang:date-and-time +--ro hostname? inet:host | {notification-hostname-sequence-number}? +--ro sequence-number? yang:counter32 | {notification-hostname-sequence-number}? +--ro notification-contents? 5.2. YANG Module The YANG module augments the module "ietf-subscribed-notifications" [RFC8641] and uses "ietf-yang-types" module [RFC6991]. Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 15] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 file "ietf-yp-notification@2024-10-18.yang" module ietf-yp-notification { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:2.0"; prefix inotenv; import ietf-yang-types { prefix yang; reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; } import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types"; } import ietf-subscribed-notifications { prefix sn; reference "RFC 8639: Subscription to YANG Notifications"; } import ietf-system-capabilities { prefix sysc; reference "RFC 9196: YANG Modules Describing Capabilities for Systems and Datastore Update Notifications"; } import ietf-notification-capabilities { prefix notc; reference "RFC 9196: YANG Modules Describing Capabilities for Systems and Datastore Update Notifications"; } organization "IETF NETCONF (Network Configuration) Working Group"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Authors: Alex Huang Feng Pierre Francois Thomas Graf Benoit Claise "; description Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 16] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 "Defines a notification header for Subscribed Notifications [RFC8639] and YANG-Push [RFC8641]. When this notification header is enabled through configuration, the root container of the notification is encoded as defined in RFCXXX. This module can be used to validate XML encoded notifications [RFC7950], JSON encoded messages [RFC7951] and CBOR encoded messages [RFC9254]. Refer to Section Y of RFC XXXX for more details. Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2024-10-18 { description "First revision"; reference "RFC XXXX: YANG-Push Notification Envelope"; } grouping notif-env-configuration { description "This grouping defines the configuration switches for enabling the notification-envelope defined in RFC XXXX and the different supported metadata."; leaf enable-notification-envelope { type boolean; default false; description "Enables YANG-Push to use the notification-envelope defined in RFC XXXX."; } container metadata { description "Container for configuring optional metadata."; } } Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 17] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 grouping notif-env-capabilities { description "This grouping defines the capabilities for the notification-envelope defined in RFC XXXX and the different supported metadata."; leaf notification-envelope { type boolean; default false; description "Supports YANG-Push to use the notification-envelope defined in RFC XXXX."; } container metadata { description "Container with the supported optional metadata by the YANG-Push publisher."; leaf hostname-sequence-number { type boolean; default false; description "Supports hostname and sequence-number in the YANG-Push notifications as defined in the YANG-Push notification-envelope in RFC XXXX."; } } } notification envelope { leaf event-time { type yang:date-and-time; mandatory true; description "The date and time the event was generated by the event source. This parameter is of type dateTime and compliant to [RFC3339]."; } leaf hostname { type inet:host; description "The hostname of the network node according to [RFC1213]. This value is usually configured on the node by the administrator to uniquely identify the node in the network."; } leaf sequence-number { type yang:counter32; description "Unique sequence number as described in [RFC9187] for each Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 18] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 published message."; } anydata notification-contents { description "This contains the values defined by the 'notification' statement unchanged."; } } // Subscription container augment "/sn:subscriptions/sn:subscription" { description "This augmentation adds the configuration switches for enabling the notification envelope and metadatas."; uses notif-env-configuration; } // Subscription RPCs augment "/sn:establish-subscription/sn:input" { description "This augmentation adds the configuration switches for enabling the notification envelope and other metadatas during the 'establish-subscription' RPC."; uses notif-env-configuration; } augment "/sn:modify-subscription/sn:input" { description "This augmentation adds the configuration switches for enabling the notification envelope and other metadatas during the 'establish-subscription' RPC."; uses notif-env-configuration; } // YANG-Push Capabilities extension augment "/sysc:system-capabilities/notc:subscription-capabilities" { description "Extension to the subscription-capabilities model to enable clients to learn whether the publisher supports the notification-envelope"; container notification-metadata { description "Adds the notification metadata capabilities to subscription capabilities."; uses notif-env-capabilities; } } } Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 19] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 6. Security Considerations TBD 7. IANA Considerations This document describes the URI used for the IETF XML Registry and registers a new YANG module name. 7.1. URI IANA is requested to add this document as a reference in the following URI in the IETF XML Registry [RFC3688]. URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:2.0 Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace. Reference: RFC-to-be 7.2. YANG module name This document registers the following YANG module in the YANG Module Names Registry [RFC6020], within the "YANG Parameters" registry: name: ietf-yp-notification namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:2.0 prefix: inotenv reference: RFC-to-be 7.3. YANG SID-file IANA is requested to register a new ".sid" file in the "IETF YANG SID Registry" [I-D.ietf-core-sid]: SID range entry point: TBD SID range size: 50 YANG module name: ietf-yp-notification reference: RFC-to-be A ".sid" file is proposed in Appendix A. 8. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Per Anderson, Andy Bierman, Carsten Bormann, Mohamed Boucadair, Tom Petch, Jason Sterne, Kent Watsen and Rob Wilton for their review and valuable comments. 9. References Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 20] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 9.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-core-sid] Veillette, M., Pelov, A., Petrov, I., Bormann, C., and M. Richardson, "YANG Schema Item iDentifier (YANG SID)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-core-sid-24, 22 December 2023, . [RFC1213] McCloghrie, K. and M. Rose, "Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets: MIB-II", STD 17, RFC 1213, DOI 10.17487/RFC1213, March 1991, . [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC3339] Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", RFC 3339, DOI 10.17487/RFC3339, July 2002, . [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC5277] Chisholm, S. and H. Trevino, "NETCONF Event Notifications", RFC 5277, DOI 10.17487/RFC5277, July 2008, . [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, . [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, . [RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013, . [RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, . Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 21] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 [RFC7951] Lhotka, L., "JSON Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG", RFC 7951, DOI 10.17487/RFC7951, August 2016, . [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [RFC8639] Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard, E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications", RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019, . [RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641, September 2019, . [RFC8791] Bierman, A., Björklund, M., and K. Watsen, "YANG Data Structure Extensions", RFC 8791, DOI 10.17487/RFC8791, June 2020, . [RFC8792] Watsen, K., Auerswald, E., Farrel, A., and Q. Wu, "Handling Long Lines in Content of Internet-Drafts and RFCs", RFC 8792, DOI 10.17487/RFC8792, June 2020, . [RFC9187] Touch, J., "Sequence Number Extension for Windowed Protocols", RFC 9187, DOI 10.17487/RFC9187, January 2022, . [RFC9196] Lengyel, B., Clemm, A., and B. Claise, "YANG Modules Describing Capabilities for Systems and Datastore Update Notifications", RFC 9196, DOI 10.17487/RFC9196, February 2022, . [RFC9254] Veillette, M., Ed., Petrov, I., Ed., Pelov, A., Bormann, C., and M. Richardson, "Encoding of Data Modeled with YANG in the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)", RFC 9254, DOI 10.17487/RFC9254, July 2022, . Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 22] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 [W3C.REC-xml-20001006] Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, M., and E. Maler, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Second Edition)", W3C, October 2000, . 9.2. Informative References [RFC6470] Bierman, A., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Base Notifications", RFC 6470, DOI 10.17487/RFC6470, February 2012, . [RFC8259] Bray, T., Ed., "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format", STD 90, RFC 8259, DOI 10.17487/RFC8259, December 2017, . [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, . [RFC9232] Song, H., Qin, F., Martinez-Julia, P., Ciavaglia, L., and A. Wang, "Network Telemetry Framework", RFC 9232, DOI 10.17487/RFC9232, May 2022, . Appendix A. .sid file Note to the RFC-Editor: Please remove this section before publishing. For CBOR encoding using YANG-SIDs identifiers, a ".sid" file is requested to IANA in Section 7.3. file "ietf-yp-notification@2024-10-18.sid" { "ietf-sid-file:sid-file": { "module-name": "ietf-yp-notification", "module-revision": "2024-10-10", "description": "YANG-Push Notification Envelope", "dependency-revision": [ { "module-name": "ietf-yang-types", "module-revision": "2013-07-15" }, { "module-name": "ietf-subscribed-notifications", "module-revision": "2019-09-09" } Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 23] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 ], "assignment-range": [ { "entry-point": "2550", "size": "50" } ], "item": [ { "namespace": "module", "identifier": "ietf-yp-notification", "sid": "2550" }, { "namespace": "data", "identifier": "/ietf-yp-notification:envelope", "sid": "2551" }, { "namespace": "data", "identifier": "/ietf-yp-notification:envelope/event-time", "sid": "2552" }, { "namespace": "data", "identifier": "/ietf-yp-notification:envelope/hostname", "sid": "2553" }, { "namespace": "data", "identifier": "/ietf-yp-notification:envelope/sequence-number", "sid": "2554" }, { "namespace": "data", "identifier": "/ietf-yp-notification:envelope/notification-contents", "sid": "2555" } ] } } Figure 6: .sid file for "ietf-yp-notification" module Authors' Addresses Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 24] Internet-Draft YANG-Push Notification Envelope October 2024 Alex Huang Feng INSA-Lyon Lyon France Email: alex.huang-feng@insa-lyon.fr Pierre Francois INSA-Lyon Lyon France Email: pierre.francois@insa-lyon.fr Thomas Graf Swisscom Binzring 17 CH-8045 Zurich Switzerland Email: thomas.graf@swisscom.com Benoit Claise Huawei Email: benoit.claise@huawei.com Huang Feng, et al. Expires 22 April 2025 [Page 25]