Internet Engineering Task Force T. Winters Internet-Draft QA Cafe Updates: 7084 (if approved) 18 October 2024 Intended status: Informational Expires: 21 April 2025 IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd-05 Abstract This document defines requirements for IPv6 CE Routers to support DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for redistributing any unused prefix(es) that were delegated to the IPv6 CE Router. This document updates RFC 7084. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 April 2025. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Winters Expires 21 April 2025 [Page 1] Internet-Draft IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation October 2024 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. IPv6 End-User Network Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.1. LAN Prefix Delegation Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1. Introduction This document defines DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation in IPv6 CE Routers ([RFC7084]) in order to properly utilize the IPv6 prefixes assigned by service providers. Many ISPs will assign a prefix larger then /64 to the CE Router, as recommended in [RFC6177]. If an IPv6 CE Router does not support IA_PD on the LAN it will not be able to assign any prefixes beyond its local interfaces, limiting the usefulness of assigning prefixes larger than /64 by the operator. Supporting IA_PD on the LAN interfaces will allow those unused prefixes to be distributed into a network. Work is being done in the areas such as Stub Networking Auto Configuration (SNAC) working group that depends on IPv6 prefixes being properly distibuted. Two models, hierarchical prefix and flat, have been proposed in the past for prefix sub-delegation beyond the IPv6 CE Router. Hierarchical prefix delegation requires an IPv6 CE Router to sub delegate IPv6 prefixes based on set of rules. If more then one router uses hierarchical prefix delegation, a IPv6 prefix tree is created. When no routing protocol is present to discover the network topology, it's possible to have unbalanced prefix delegation tree which leads to running out of prefixes. For more information on heirachical prefix delegation is contained in Section 8.5 of CableLabs IPv6 eRouter Specifiction [eRouter]. A flat prefix delegation requires the router to be provisioned with the initial prefix and to assign /64 prefixes to all other prefix requests from routers downstream. As the default configuration is designed to be the flat model to support zero configuration networking. Winters Expires 21 April 2025 [Page 2] Internet-Draft IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation October 2024 The Home Networking working group producted solutions for prefix delegation for home networks, including [RFC7695]. The Home Networking solutions haven't been deployed by ISPs or IPv6 CE Routers since the publication partially due to their complexity. This document does not cover dealing with multi-provisioned networks with more than one provider. Due to complexity of a solution that would require routing, provisioning and policy, this is out of scope of this document. 2. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. This document also makes use of internal conceptual variables to describe protocol behavior and external variables that an implementation must allow system administrators to change. The specific variable names, how their values change, and how their settings influence protocol behavior are provided to demonstrate protocol behavior. An implementation is not required to have them in the exact form described here, as long as its external behavior is consistent with that described in this document. 3. Terminology The following terminology is defined for this document. * IPv6 CE Router: A router intended for home or small-office use that forwards packets not explicitly addressed to itself as defined in [RFC7084]. * Internet Service Provider (ISP): An entity that provides access to the Internet. In this document, a service provider specifically offers Internet access using IPv6, and may also offer IPv4 Internet access. The service provider can provide such access over a variety of different transport methods such as DSL, cable, wireless, and others. 4. IPv6 End-User Network Architecture The end-user network that has IPv6 Customer Edge Routers with routers and hosts downstream. Figure 1 illustrates the model topology. Winters Expires 21 April 2025 [Page 3] Internet-Draft IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation October 2024 +-----------+ | Service | | Provider | | Router | +-----+-----+ | | | Customer | Internet Connection | +-----v-----+ | IPv6 | | CE | | Router | +-----+-----+ | +----+-+-------+ | | | | +---+----+ +-----+------+ | IPv6 | | | | Host | | Router | | | | | +--------+ +------------+ Figure 1: Example IPv6 End User Topology 5. Requirements The IPv6 CE Router distributes configuration information obtained during WAN interface provisioning to IPv6 hosts and routers. Previously, a router based on [RFC7084] would only provide IPv6 hosts with individual addresses; this update allows for addressing and routing of IPv6 prefixes to both hosts and routers. 5.1. LAN Prefix Delegation Requirements LPD-1: The IPv6 CE Router MUST support a DHCPv6 server capable of IPv6 prefix assignment according to [RFC8415] (Identity Association for Prefix Delegation (IA_PD) option). LPD-2: The IPv6 CE Router MUST assign a prefix from the delegated prefix as specified by L-2 [RFC7084]. If not enough addresses are available the IPv6 CE Router SHOULD log a system management error. LPD-3: The prefix assigned to a link MUST NOT change in the absence of topology or configuration changes. Winters Expires 21 April 2025 [Page 4] Internet-Draft IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation October 2024 LPD-4: After LAN link prefix assignment the IPv6 CE Router MUST make the remaining IPv6 prefixes available to other routers via Prefix Delegation. LPD-5: The IPv6 CE Router MUST install a route to the assigned IA_PD with a next-hop of the IPv6 node that was assigned the prefix. The IPv6 CE Router MUST remove the route when IA_PD lease expires. LPD-6: By default, the IPv6 CE Router firewall MUST allow forwarding of packets with an outer IPv6 header containing a source address belonging to Delegated Prefixes, along with reciprocal packets from the same flow, following the recommendations of [RFC6092]. This updates WPD-5 of [RFC7084] to not drop packets from prefixes that have been delegated. LPD-7: The IPv6 CE Router MUST provision IA_PD prefixes with a prefix-length of 64 unless configured to different prefix- length by the user. The prefix length of 64 is used as that is the current prefix length supported by SLAAC. LPD-8: If the CE Router is configured to generate a ULA prefix as defined in ULA-1 of [RFC7084] after LAN link prefix assignment of the ULA prefixes the IPv6 CE Router MUST make the remaining IPv6 prefixes available to other routers via Prefix Delegation. LPD-9: IPv6 CE Router MUST NOT delegate prefixes via DHCPv6 on the LAN using lifetimes that exceed the remaining lifetimes of the corresponding prefixes learned on the WAN via DHCPv6-PD. 6. Security Considerations This document does not add any new security considerations beyond those mentioned in Section 4 of [RFC8213] and Section 22 of [RFC8415]. 7. IANA Considerations This document makes no request of IANA. 8. Acknowledgements Thanks to the following people for their guidance and feedback: Marion Dillon, Erik Auerswald, Esko Dijk, Tim Carlin, Richard Patterson, Ted Lemon, Michael Richardson, Martin Huneki, Gabor Lencse, Ole Troan, Brian Carpenter, David Farmer, Tim Chown. Winters Expires 21 April 2025 [Page 5] Internet-Draft IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation October 2024 9. References 9.1. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC6092] Woodyatt, J., Ed., "Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service", RFC 6092, DOI 10.17487/RFC6092, January 2011, . [RFC6177] Narten, T., Huston, G., and L. Roberts, "IPv6 Address Assignment to End Sites", BCP 157, RFC 6177, DOI 10.17487/RFC6177, March 2011, . [RFC7084] Singh, H., Beebee, W., Donley, C., and B. Stark, "Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers", RFC 7084, DOI 10.17487/RFC7084, November 2013, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [RFC8213] Volz, B. and Y. Pal, "Security of Messages Exchanged between Servers and Relay Agents", RFC 8213, DOI 10.17487/RFC8213, August 2017, . [RFC8415] Mrugalski, T., Siodelski, M., Volz, B., Yourtchenko, A., Richardson, M., Jiang, S., Lemon, T., and T. Winters, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 8415, DOI 10.17487/RFC8415, November 2018, . 9.2. Informative References [RFC7695] Pfister, P., Paterson, B., and J. Arkko, "Distributed Prefix Assignment Algorithm", RFC 7695, DOI 10.17487/RFC7695, November 2015, . Winters Expires 21 April 2025 [Page 6] Internet-Draft IPv6 CE Routers LAN Prefix Delegation October 2024 [eRouter] CableLabs, "IPv4 and IPv6 eRouter Specification Version I21", February 2022, . Author's Address Timothy Winters QA Cafe 100 Main Street, Suite #212 Dover, NH 03820 United States of America Email: tim@qacafe.com Winters Expires 21 April 2025 [Page 7]