@c -*-texinfo-*-
@c This is part of the XEmacs Lisp Reference Manual.
@c Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 
@c See the file lispref.texi for copying conditions.
@setfilename ../../info/control.info
@node Control Structures, Variables, Evaluation, Top
@chapter Control Structures
@cindex special forms for control structures
@cindex control structures

  A Lisp program consists of expressions or @dfn{forms} (@pxref{Forms}).
We control the order of execution of the forms by enclosing them in
@dfn{control structures}.  Control structures are special forms which
control when, whether, or how many times to execute the forms they contain.

  The simplest control structure is sequential execution: first form
@var{a}, then form @var{b}, and so on.  This is what happens when you
write several forms in succession in the body of a function, or at top
level in a file of Lisp code---the forms are executed in the order they
are written.  We call this @dfn{textual order}.  For example, if a
function body consists of two forms @var{a} and @var{b}, evaluation of
the function evaluates first @var{a} and then @var{b}, and the
function's value is the value of @var{b}.

  Naturally, Emacs Lisp has many kinds of control structures, including
other varieties of sequencing, function calls, conditionals, iteration,
and (controlled) jumps.  The built-in control structures are special forms
since their subforms are not necessarily evaluated.  You can use macros
to define your own control structure constructs (@pxref{Macros}).

@menu
* Sequencing::             Evaluation in textual order.
* Conditionals::           @code{if}, @code{cond}.
* Combining Conditions::   @code{and}, @code{or}, @code{not}.
* Iteration::              @code{while} loops.
* Nonlocal Exits::         Jumping out of a sequence.
@end menu

@node Sequencing
@section Sequencing

  Evaluating forms in the order they are written is the most common
control structure.  Sometimes this happens automatically, such as in a
function body.  Elsewhere you must use a control structure construct to
do this: @code{progn}, the simplest control construct of Lisp.

  A @code{progn} special form looks like this:

@example
@group
(progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c} @dots{})
@end group
@end example

@noindent
and it says to execute the forms @var{a}, @var{b}, @var{c} and so on, in
that order.  These forms are called the body of the @code{progn} form.
The value of the last form in the body becomes the value of the entire
@code{progn}.

@cindex implicit @code{progn}
  When Lisp was young, @code{progn} was the only way to execute two or
more forms in succession and use the value of the last of them.  But
programmers found they often needed to use a @code{progn} in the body of
a function, where (at that time) only one form was allowed.  So the body
of a function was made into an ``implicit @code{progn}'': several forms
are allowed just as in the body of an actual @code{progn}.  Many other
control structures likewise contain an implicit @code{progn}.  As a
result, @code{progn} is not used as often as it used to be.  It is
needed now most often inside of an @code{unwind-protect}, @code{and}, or
@code{or}.

@defspec progn forms@dots{}
This special form evaluates all of the @var{forms}, in textual
order, returning the result of the final form.

@example
@group
(progn (print "The first form")
       (print "The second form")
       (print "The third form"))
     @print{} "The first form"
     @print{} "The second form"
     @print{} "The third form"
@result{} "The third form"
@end group
@end example
@end defspec

  Two other control constructs likewise evaluate a series of forms but return
a different value:

@defspec prog1 form1 forms@dots{}
This special form evaluates @var{form1} and all of the @var{forms}, in
textual order, returning the result of @var{form1}.

@example
@group
(prog1 (print "The first form")
       (print "The second form")
       (print "The third form"))
     @print{} "The first form"
     @print{} "The second form"
     @print{} "The third form"
@result{} "The first form"
@end group
@end example

Here is a way to remove the first element from a list in the variable
@code{x}, then return the value of that former element:

@example
(prog1 (car x) (setq x (cdr x)))
@end example
@end defspec

@defspec prog2 form1 form2 forms@dots{}
This special form evaluates @var{form1}, @var{form2}, and all of the
following @var{forms}, in textual order, returning the result of
@var{form2}.

@example
@group
(prog2 (print "The first form")
       (print "The second form")
       (print "The third form"))
     @print{} "The first form"
     @print{} "The second form"
     @print{} "The third form"
@result{} "The second form"
@end group
@end example
@end defspec

@node Conditionals
@section Conditionals
@cindex conditional evaluation

  Conditional control structures choose among alternatives.  Emacs Lisp
has two conditional forms: @code{if}, which is much the same as in other
languages, and @code{cond}, which is a generalized case statement.

@defspec if condition then-form else-forms@dots{}
@code{if} chooses between the @var{then-form} and the @var{else-forms}
based on the value of @var{condition}.  If the evaluated @var{condition} is
non-@code{nil}, @var{then-form} is evaluated and the result returned.
Otherwise, the @var{else-forms} are evaluated in textual order, and the
value of the last one is returned.  (The @var{else} part of @code{if} is
an example of an implicit @code{progn}.  @xref{Sequencing}.) 

If @var{condition} has the value @code{nil}, and no @var{else-forms} are
given, @code{if} returns @code{nil}.

@code{if} is a special form because the branch which is not selected is
never evaluated---it is ignored.  Thus, in the example below,
@code{true} is not printed because @code{print} is never called.

@example
@group
(if nil 
    (print 'true) 
  'very-false)
@result{} very-false
@end group
@end example
@end defspec

@defspec cond clause@dots{}
@code{cond} chooses among an arbitrary number of alternatives.  Each
@var{clause} in the @code{cond} must be a list.  The @sc{car} of this
list is the @var{condition}; the remaining elements, if any, the
@var{body-forms}.  Thus, a clause looks like this:

@example
(@var{condition} @var{body-forms}@dots{})
@end example

@code{cond} tries the clauses in textual order, by evaluating the
@var{condition} of each clause.  If the value of @var{condition} is
non-@code{nil}, the @var{body-forms} are evaluated, and the value of the
last of @var{body-forms} becomes the value of the @code{cond}.  The
remaining clauses are ignored.

If the value of @var{condition} is @code{nil}, the clause ``fails'', so
the @code{cond} moves on to the following clause, trying its
@var{condition}.

If every @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil}, so that every clause
fails, @code{cond} returns @code{nil}.

A clause may also look like this:

@example
(@var{condition})
@end example

@noindent
Then, if @var{condition} is non-@code{nil} when tested, the value of
@var{condition} becomes the value of the @code{cond} form.

The following example has four clauses, which test for the cases where
the value of @code{x} is a number, string, buffer and symbol,
respectively:

@example
@group
(cond ((numberp x) x)
      ((stringp x) x)
      ((bufferp x)
       (setq temporary-hack x) ; @r{multiple body-forms}
       (buffer-name x))        ; @r{in one clause}
      ((symbolp x) (symbol-value x)))
@end group
@end example

Often we want the last clause to be executed whenever none of the
previous clauses was successful.  To do this, we use @code{t} as the
@var{condition} of the last clause, like this: @code{(t
@var{body-forms})}.  The form @code{t} evaluates to @code{t}, which
is never @code{nil}, so this clause never fails, provided the
@code{cond} gets to it at all.

For example, 

@example
@group
(cond ((eq a 1) 'foo)
      (t "default"))
@result{} "default"
@end group
@end example

@noindent
This expression is a @code{cond} which returns @code{foo} if the value
of @code{a} is 1, and returns the string @code{"default"} otherwise.
@end defspec

Both @code{cond} and @code{if} can usually be written in terms of the
other.  Therefore, the choice between them is a matter of taste and
style.  For example:

@example
@group
(if @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
@equiv{}
(cond (@var{a} @var{b}) (t @var{c}))
@end group
@end example

@node Combining Conditions
@section Constructs for Combining Conditions

  This section describes three constructs that are often used together
with @code{if} and @code{cond} to express complicated conditions.  The
constructs @code{and} and @code{or} can also be used individually as
kinds of multiple conditional constructs.

@defun not condition
This function tests for the falsehood of @var{condition}.  It returns
@code{t} if @var{condition} is @code{nil}, and @code{nil} otherwise.
The function @code{not} is identical to @code{null}, and we recommend
using @code{null} if you are testing for an empty list.
@end defun

@defspec and conditions@dots{}
The @code{and} special form tests whether all the @var{conditions} are
true.  It works by evaluating the @var{conditions} one by one in the
order written.

If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to @code{nil}, then the result
of the @code{and} must be @code{nil} regardless of the remaining
@var{conditions}; so the remaining @var{conditions} are ignored and the
@code{and} returns right away.

If all the @var{conditions} turn out non-@code{nil}, then the value of
the last of them becomes the value of the @code{and} form.

Here is an example.  The first condition returns the integer 1, which is
not @code{nil}.  Similarly, the second condition returns the integer 2,
which is not @code{nil}.  The third condition is @code{nil}, so the
remaining condition is never evaluated.

@example
@group
(and (print 1) (print 2) nil (print 3))
     @print{} 1
     @print{} 2
@result{} nil
@end group
@end example

Here is a more realistic example of using @code{and}:

@example
@group
(if (and (consp foo) (eq (car foo) 'x))
    (message "foo is a list starting with x"))
@end group
@end example

@noindent
Note that @code{(car foo)} is not executed if @code{(consp foo)} returns
@code{nil}, thus avoiding an error.

@code{and} can be expressed in terms of either @code{if} or @code{cond}.
For example:

@example
@group
(and @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
@equiv{}
(if @var{arg1} (if @var{arg2} @var{arg3}))
@equiv{}
(cond (@var{arg1} (cond (@var{arg2} @var{arg3}))))
@end group
@end example
@end defspec

@defspec or conditions@dots{}
The @code{or} special form tests whether at least one of the
@var{conditions} is true.  It works by evaluating all the
@var{conditions} one by one in the order written.

If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to a non-@code{nil} value, then
the result of the @code{or} must be non-@code{nil}; so the remaining
@var{conditions} are ignored and the @code{or} returns right away.  The
value it returns is the non-@code{nil} value of the condition just
evaluated.

If all the @var{conditions} turn out @code{nil}, then the @code{or}
expression returns @code{nil}.

For example, this expression tests whether @code{x} is either 0 or
@code{nil}:

@example
(or (eq x nil) (= x 0))
@end example

Like the @code{and} construct, @code{or} can be written in terms of
@code{cond}.  For example:

@example
@group
(or @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
@equiv{}
(cond (@var{arg1})
      (@var{arg2})
      (@var{arg3}))
@end group
@end example

You could almost write @code{or} in terms of @code{if}, but not quite:

@example
@group
(if @var{arg1} @var{arg1}
  (if @var{arg2} @var{arg2} 
    @var{arg3}))
@end group
@end example

@noindent
This is not completely equivalent because it can evaluate @var{arg1} or
@var{arg2} twice.  By contrast, @code{(or @var{arg1} @var{arg2}
@var{arg3})} never evaluates any argument more than once.
@end defspec

@node Iteration
@section Iteration
@cindex iteration
@cindex recursion

  Iteration means executing part of a program repetitively.  For example,
you might want to repeat some expressions once for each element of a list,
or once for each integer from 0 to @var{n}.  You can do this in Emacs Lisp
with the special form @code{while}:

@defspec while condition forms@dots{}
@code{while} first evaluates @var{condition}.  If the result is
non-@code{nil}, it evaluates @var{forms} in textual order.  Then it
reevaluates @var{condition}, and if the result is non-@code{nil}, it
evaluates @var{forms} again.  This process repeats until @var{condition}
evaluates to @code{nil}.

There is no limit on the number of iterations that may occur.  The loop
will continue until either @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil} or
until an error or @code{throw} jumps out of it (@pxref{Nonlocal Exits}).

The value of a @code{while} form is always @code{nil}.

@example
@group
(setq num 0)
     @result{} 0
@end group
@group
(while (< num 4)
  (princ (format "Iteration %d." num))
  (setq num (1+ num)))
     @print{} Iteration 0.
     @print{} Iteration 1.
     @print{} Iteration 2.
     @print{} Iteration 3.
     @result{} nil
@end group
@end example

If you would like to execute something on each iteration before the
end-test, put it together with the end-test in a @code{progn} as the
first argument of @code{while}, as shown here:

@example
@group
(while (progn
         (forward-line 1)
         (not (looking-at "^$"))))
@end group
@end example

@noindent
This moves forward one line and continues moving by lines until an empty
line is reached.
@end defspec

@node Nonlocal Exits
@section Nonlocal Exits
@cindex nonlocal exits

  A @dfn{nonlocal exit} is a transfer of control from one point in a
program to another remote point.  Nonlocal exits can occur in Emacs Lisp
as a result of errors; you can also use them under explicit control.
Nonlocal exits unbind all variable bindings made by the constructs being
exited.

@menu
* Catch and Throw::     Nonlocal exits for the program's own purposes.
* Examples of Catch::   Showing how such nonlocal exits can be written.
* Errors::              How errors are signaled and handled.
* Cleanups::            Arranging to run a cleanup form if an error happens.
@end menu

@node Catch and Throw
@subsection Explicit Nonlocal Exits: @code{catch} and @code{throw}

  Most control constructs affect only the flow of control within the
construct itself.  The function @code{throw} is the exception to this
rule for of normal program execution: it performs a nonlocal exit on
request.  (There are other exceptions, but they are for error handling
only.)  @code{throw} is used inside a @code{catch}, and jumps back to
that @code{catch}.  For example:

@example
@group
(catch 'foo
  (progn
    @dots{}
      (throw 'foo t)
    @dots{}))
@end group
@end example

@noindent
The @code{throw} transfers control straight back to the corresponding
@code{catch}, which returns immediately.  The code following the
@code{throw} is not executed.  The second argument of @code{throw} is used
as the return value of the @code{catch}.

  The @code{throw} and the @code{catch} are matched through the first
argument: @code{throw} searches for a @code{catch} whose first argument
is @code{eq} to the one specified.  Thus, in the above example, the
@code{throw} specifies @code{foo}, and the @code{catch} specifies the
same symbol, so that @code{catch} is applicable.  If there is more than
one applicable @code{catch}, the innermost one takes precedence.

  All Lisp constructs between the @code{catch} and the @code{throw},
including function calls, are exited automatically along with the
@code{catch}.  When binding constructs such as @code{let} or function
calls are exited in this way, the bindings are unbound, just as they are
when these constructs are exited normally (@pxref{Local Variables}).
Likewise, the buffer and position saved by @code{save-excursion}
(@pxref{Excursions}) are restored, and so is the narrowing status
saved by @code{save-restriction} and the window selection saved by
@code{save-window-excursion} (@pxref{Window Configurations}).  Any
cleanups established with the @code{unwind-protect} special form are
executed if the @code{unwind-protect} is exited with a @code{throw}.

  The @code{throw} need not appear lexically within the @code{catch}
that it jumps to.  It can equally well be called from another function
called within the @code{catch}.  As long as the @code{throw} takes place
chronologically after entry to the @code{catch}, and chronologically
before exit from it, it has access to that @code{catch}.  This is why
@code{throw} can be used in commands such as @code{exit-recursive-edit}
which throw back to the editor command loop (@pxref{Recursive Editing}).

@cindex CL note---only @code{throw} in Emacs
@quotation
@b{Common Lisp note:} most other versions of Lisp, including Common Lisp,
have several ways of transferring control nonsequentially: @code{return},
@code{return-from}, and @code{go}, for example.  Emacs Lisp has only
@code{throw}.
@end quotation

@defspec catch tag body@dots{}
@cindex tag on run time stack
@code{catch} establishes a return point for the @code{throw} function.  The
return point is distinguished from other such return points by @var{tag},
which may be any Lisp object.  The argument @var{tag} is evaluated normally
before the return point is established.

With the return point in effect, the forms of the @var{body} are evaluated
in textual order.  If the forms execute normally, without error or nonlocal
exit, the value of the last body form is returned from the @code{catch}.

If a @code{throw} is done within @var{body} specifying the same value
@var{tag}, the @code{catch} exits immediately; the value it returns is
whatever was specified as the second argument of @code{throw}.
@end defspec

@defun throw tag value
The purpose of @code{throw} is to return from a return point previously
established with @code{catch}.  The argument @var{tag} is used to choose
among the various existing return points; it must be @code{eq} to the value
specified in the @code{catch}.  If multiple return points match @var{tag},
the innermost one is used.

The argument @var{value} is used as the value to return from that
@code{catch}.

@kindex no-catch
If no return point is in effect with tag @var{tag}, then a @code{no-catch}
error is signaled with data @code{(@var{tag} @var{value})}.
@end defun

@node Examples of Catch
@subsection Examples of @code{catch} and @code{throw}

  One way to use @code{catch} and @code{throw} is to exit from a doubly
nested loop.  (In most languages, this would be done with a ``go to''.)
Here we compute @code{(foo @var{i} @var{j})} for @var{i} and @var{j}
varying from 0 to 9:

@example
@group
(defun search-foo ()
  (catch 'loop
    (let ((i 0))
      (while (< i 10)
        (let ((j 0))
          (while (< j 10)
            (if (foo i j)
                (throw 'loop (list i j)))
            (setq j (1+ j))))
        (setq i (1+ i))))))
@end group
@end example

@noindent
If @code{foo} ever returns non-@code{nil}, we stop immediately and return a
list of @var{i} and @var{j}.  If @code{foo} always returns @code{nil}, the
@code{catch} returns normally, and the value is @code{nil}, since that
is the result of the @code{while}.

  Here are two tricky examples, slightly different, showing two
return points at once.  First, two return points with the same tag,
@code{hack}:

@example
@group
(defun catch2 (tag)
  (catch tag
    (throw 'hack 'yes)))
@result{} catch2
@end group

@group
(catch 'hack 
  (print (catch2 'hack))
  'no)
@print{} yes
@result{} no
@end group
@end example

@noindent
Since both return points have tags that match the @code{throw}, it goes to
the inner one, the one established in @code{catch2}.  Therefore,
@code{catch2} returns normally with value @code{yes}, and this value is
printed.  Finally the second body form in the outer @code{catch}, which is
@code{'no}, is evaluated and returned from the outer @code{catch}.

  Now let's change the argument given to @code{catch2}:

@example
@group
(defun catch2 (tag)
  (catch tag
    (throw 'hack 'yes)))
@result{} catch2
@end group

@group
(catch 'hack
  (print (catch2 'quux))
  'no)
@result{} yes
@end group
@end example

@noindent
We still have two return points, but this time only the outer one has the
tag @code{hack}; the inner one has the tag @code{quux} instead.  Therefore,
the @code{throw} returns the value @code{yes} from the outer return point.
The function @code{print} is never called, and the body-form @code{'no} is
never evaluated.

@node Errors
@subsection Errors
@cindex errors

  When Emacs Lisp attempts to evaluate a form that, for some reason,
cannot be evaluated, it @dfn{signals} an @dfn{error}.

  When an error is signaled, XEmacs's default reaction is to print an
error message and terminate execution of the current command.  This is
the right thing to do in most cases, such as if you type @kbd{C-f} at
the end of the buffer.

  In complicated programs, simple termination may not be what you want.
For example, the program may have made temporary changes in data
structures, or created temporary buffers which should be deleted before
the program is finished.  In such cases, you would use
@code{unwind-protect} to establish @dfn{cleanup expressions} to be
evaluated in case of error.  Occasionally, you may wish the program to
continue execution despite an error in a subroutine.  In these cases,
you would use @code{condition-case} to establish @dfn{error handlers} to
recover control in case of error.

  Resist the temptation to use error handling to transfer control from
one part of the program to another; use @code{catch} and @code{throw}.
@xref{Catch and Throw}.

@menu
* Signaling Errors::      How to report an error.
* Processing of Errors::  What XEmacs does when you report an error.
* Handling Errors::       How you can trap errors and continue execution.
* Error Names::           How errors are classified for trapping them.
@end menu

@node Signaling Errors
@subsubsection How to Signal an Error
@cindex signaling errors

  Most errors are signaled ``automatically'' within Lisp primitives
which you call for other purposes, such as if you try to take the
@sc{car} of an integer or move forward a character at the end of the
buffer; you can also signal errors explicitly with the functions
@code{error} and @code{signal}.

  Quitting, which happens when the user types @kbd{C-g}, is not 
considered an error, but it handled almost like an error.
@xref{Quitting}.

@defun error format-string &rest args
This function signals an error with an error message constructed by
applying @code{format} (@pxref{String Conversion}) to
@var{format-string} and @var{args}.

Typical uses of @code{error} is shown in the following examples:

@example
@group
(error "You have committed an error.  
        Try something else.")
     @error{} You have committed an error.  
        Try something else.
@end group

@group
(error "You have committed %d errors." 10)
     @error{} You have committed 10 errors.  
@end group
@end example

@code{error} works by calling @code{signal} with two arguments: the
error symbol @code{error}, and a list containing the string returned by
@code{format}.

If you want to use a user-supplied string as an error message verbatim,
don't just write @code{(error @var{string})}.  If @var{string} contains
@samp{%}, it will be interpreted as a format specifier, with undesirable
results.  Instead, use @code{(error "%s" @var{string})}.
@end defun

@defun signal error-symbol data
This function signals an error named by @var{error-symbol}.  The
argument @var{data} is a list of additional Lisp objects relevant to the
circumstances of the error.

The argument @var{error-symbol} must be an @dfn{error symbol}---a symbol
bearing a property @code{error-conditions} whose value is a list of
condition names.  This is how different sorts of errors are classified.

The number and significance of the objects in @var{data} depends on
@var{error-symbol}.  For example, with a @code{wrong-type-arg} error,
there are two objects in the list: a predicate which describes the type
that was expected, and the object which failed to fit that type.
@xref{Error Names}, for a description of error symbols.

Both @var{error-symbol} and @var{data} are available to any error
handlers which handle the error: a list @w{@code{(@var{error-symbol} .@:
@var{data})}} is constructed to become the value of the local variable
bound in the @code{condition-case} form (@pxref{Handling Errors}).  If
the error is not handled, both of them are used in printing the error
message.

The function @code{signal} never returns (though in older Emacs versions
it could sometimes return).

@smallexample
@group
(signal 'wrong-number-of-arguments '(x y))
     @error{} Wrong number of arguments: x, y
@end group

@group
(signal 'no-such-error '("My unknown error condition."))
     @error{} peculiar error: "My unknown error condition."
@end group
@end smallexample
@end defun

@cindex CL note---no continuable errors
@quotation
@b{Common Lisp note:} Emacs Lisp has nothing like the Common Lisp
concept of continuable errors.
@end quotation

@node Processing of Errors
@subsubsection How XEmacs Processes Errors

When an error is signaled, XEmacs searches for an active @dfn{handler}
for the error.  A handler is a specially marked place in the Lisp code
of the current function or any of the functions by which it was called.
If an applicable handler exists, its code is executed, and control
resumes following the handler.  The handler executes in the environment
of the @code{condition-case} which established it; all functions called
within that @code{condition-case} have already been exited, and the
handler cannot return to them.

If no applicable handler is in effect in your program, the current
command is terminated and control returns to the editor command loop,
because the command loop has an implicit handler for all kinds of
errors.  The command loop's handler uses the error symbol and associated
data to print an error message.

@cindex @code{debug-on-error} use
When an error is not handled explicitly, it may cause the Lisp debugger
to be called.  The debugger is enabled if the variable
@code{debug-on-error} (@pxref{Error Debugging}) is non-@code{nil}.
Unlike error handlers, the debugger runs in the environment of the
error, so that you can examine values of variables precisely as they
were at the time of the error.

@node Handling Errors
@subsubsection Writing Code to Handle Errors
@cindex error handler
@cindex handling errors

  The usual effect of signaling an error is to terminate the command that
is running and return immediately to the XEmacs editor command loop.
You can arrange to trap errors occurring in a part of your program by
establishing an @dfn{error handler} with the special form
@code{condition-case}.  A simple example looks like this:

@example
@group
(condition-case nil
    (delete-file filename)
  (error nil))
@end group
@end example

@noindent
This deletes the file named @var{filename}, catching any error and
returning @code{nil} if an error occurs.

  The second argument of @code{condition-case} is called the
@dfn{protected form}.  (In the example above, the protected form is a
call to @code{delete-file}.)  The error handlers go into effect when
this form begins execution and are deactivated when this form returns.
They remain in effect for all the intervening time.  In particular, they
are in effect during the execution of subroutines called by this form,
and their subroutines, and so on.  This is a good thing, since, strictly
speaking, errors can be signaled only by Lisp primitives (including
@code{signal} and @code{error}) called by the protected form, not by the
protected form itself.

  The arguments after the protected form are handlers.  Each handler
lists one or more @dfn{condition names} (which are symbols) to specify
which errors it will handle.  The error symbol specified when an error
is signaled also defines a list of condition names.  A handler applies
to an error if they have any condition names in common.  In the example
above, there is one handler, and it specifies one condition name,
@code{error}, which covers all errors.

  The search for an applicable handler checks all the established handlers
starting with the most recently established one.  Thus, if two nested
@code{condition-case} forms try to handle the same error, the inner of
the two will actually handle it.

  When an error is handled, control returns to the handler.  Before this
happens, XEmacs unbinds all variable bindings made by binding constructs
that are being exited and executes the cleanups of all
@code{unwind-protect} forms that are exited.  Once control arrives at
the handler, the body of the handler is executed.

  After execution of the handler body, execution continues by returning
from the @code{condition-case} form.  Because the protected form is
exited completely before execution of the handler, the handler cannot
resume execution at the point of the error, nor can it examine variable
bindings that were made within the protected form.  All it can do is
clean up and proceed.

  @code{condition-case} is often used to trap errors that are
predictable, such as failure to open a file in a call to
@code{insert-file-contents}.  It is also used to trap errors that are
totally unpredictable, such as when the program evaluates an expression
read from the user.

  Error signaling and handling have some resemblance to @code{throw} and
@code{catch}, but they are entirely separate facilities.  An error
cannot be caught by a @code{catch}, and a @code{throw} cannot be handled
by an error handler (though using @code{throw} when there is no suitable
@code{catch} signals an error which can be handled).

@defspec condition-case var protected-form handlers@dots{}
This special form establishes the error handlers @var{handlers} around
the execution of @var{protected-form}.  If @var{protected-form} executes
without error, the value it returns becomes the value of the
@code{condition-case} form; in this case, the @code{condition-case} has
no effect.  The @code{condition-case} form makes a difference when an
error occurs during @var{protected-form}.

Each of the @var{handlers} is a list of the form @code{(@var{conditions}
@var{body}@dots{})}.  @var{conditions} is an error condition name to be
handled, or a list of condition names; @var{body} is one or more Lisp
expressions to be executed when this handler handles an error.  Here are
examples of handlers:

@smallexample
@group
(error nil)

(arith-error (message "Division by zero"))

((arith-error file-error)
 (message
  "Either division by zero or failure to open a file"))
@end group
@end smallexample

Each error that occurs has an @dfn{error symbol} which describes what
kind of error it is.  The @code{error-conditions} property of this
symbol is a list of condition names (@pxref{Error Names}).  XEmacs
searches all the active @code{condition-case} forms for a handler which
specifies one or more of these names; the innermost matching
@code{condition-case} handles the error.  The handlers in this
@code{condition-case} are tested in the order in which they appear.

The body of the handler is then executed, and the @code{condition-case}
returns normally, using the value of the last form in the body as the
overall value.

The argument @var{var} is a variable.  @code{condition-case} does not
bind this variable when executing the @var{protected-form}, only when it
handles an error.  At that time, @var{var} is bound locally to a list of
the form @code{(@var{error-symbol} . @var{data})}, giving the
particulars of the error.  The handler can refer to this list to decide
what to do.  For example, if the error is for failure opening a file,
the file name is the second element of @var{data}---the third element of
@var{var}.

If @var{var} is @code{nil}, that means no variable is bound.  Then the
error symbol and associated data are not made available to the handler.
@end defspec

@cindex @code{arith-error} example
  Here is an example of using @code{condition-case} to handle the error
that results from dividing by zero.  The handler prints out a warning
message and returns a very large number.

@smallexample
@group
(defun safe-divide (dividend divisor)
  (condition-case err                
      ;; @r{Protected form.}
      (/ dividend divisor)              
    ;; @r{The handler.}
    (arith-error                        ; @r{Condition.}
     (princ (format "Arithmetic error: %s" err))
     1000000)))
@result{} safe-divide
@end group

@group
(safe-divide 5 0)
     @print{} Arithmetic error: (arith-error)
@result{} 1000000
@end group
@end smallexample

@noindent
The handler specifies condition name @code{arith-error} so that it will handle only division-by-zero errors.  Other kinds of errors will not be handled, at least not by this @code{condition-case}.  Thus,

@smallexample
@group
(safe-divide nil 3)
     @error{} Wrong type argument: integer-or-marker-p, nil
@end group
@end smallexample

  Here is a @code{condition-case} that catches all kinds of errors,
including those signaled with @code{error}:

@smallexample
@group
(setq baz 34)
     @result{} 34
@end group

@group
(condition-case err
    (if (eq baz 35)
        t
      ;; @r{This is a call to the function @code{error}.}
      (error "Rats!  The variable %s was %s, not 35." 'baz baz))
  ;; @r{This is the handler; it is not a form.}
  (error (princ (format "The error was: %s" err)) 
         2))
@print{} The error was: (error "Rats!  The variable baz was 34, not 35.")
@result{} 2
@end group
@end smallexample

@node Error Names
@subsubsection Error Symbols and Condition Names
@cindex error symbol
@cindex error name
@cindex condition name
@cindex user-defined error
@kindex error-conditions

  When you signal an error, you specify an @dfn{error symbol} to specify
the kind of error you have in mind.  Each error has one and only one
error symbol to categorize it.  This is the finest classification of
errors defined by the Lisp language.

  These narrow classifications are grouped into a hierarchy of wider
classes called @dfn{error conditions}, identified by @dfn{condition
names}.  The narrowest such classes belong to the error symbols
themselves: each error symbol is also a condition name.  There are also
condition names for more extensive classes, up to the condition name
@code{error} which takes in all kinds of errors.  Thus, each error has
one or more condition names: @code{error}, the error symbol if that
is distinct from @code{error}, and perhaps some intermediate
classifications.

  In order for a symbol to be usable as an error symbol, it must have an
@code{error-conditions} property which gives a list of condition names.
This list defines the conditions which this kind of error belongs to.
(The error symbol itself, and the symbol @code{error}, should always be
members of this list.)  Thus, the hierarchy of condition names is
defined by the @code{error-conditions} properties of the error symbols.

  In addition to the @code{error-conditions} list, the error symbol
should have an @code{error-message} property whose value is a string to
be printed when that error is signaled but not handled.  If the
@code{error-message} property exists, but is not a string, the error
message @samp{peculiar error} is used.
@cindex peculiar error

  Here is how we define a new error symbol, @code{new-error}:

@example
@group
(put 'new-error
     'error-conditions
     '(error my-own-errors new-error))       
     @result{} (error my-own-errors new-error)
@end group
@group
(put 'new-error 'error-message "A new error")
     @result{} "A new error"
@end group
@end example

@noindent
This error has three condition names: @code{new-error}, the narrowest
classification; @code{my-own-errors}, which we imagine is a wider
classification; and @code{error}, which is the widest of all.
 
  Naturally, XEmacs will never signal a @code{new-error} on its own; only
an explicit call to @code{signal} (@pxref{Errors}) in your code can do
this:

@example
@group
(signal 'new-error '(x y))
     @error{} A new error: x, y
@end group
@end example

  This error can be handled through any of the three condition names.
This example handles @code{new-error} and any other errors in the class
@code{my-own-errors}:

@example
@group
(condition-case foo
    (bar nil t)
  (my-own-errors nil))
@end group
@end example

  The significant way that errors are classified is by their condition
names---the names used to match errors with handlers.  An error symbol
serves only as a convenient way to specify the intended error message
and list of condition names.  If @code{signal} were given a list of
condition names rather than one error symbol, that would be cumbersome.

  By contrast, using only error symbols without condition names would
seriously decrease the power of @code{condition-case}.  Condition names
make it possible to categorize errors at various levels of generality
when you write an error handler.  Using error symbols alone would
eliminate all but the narrowest level of classification.

  @xref{Standard Errors}, for a list of all the standard error symbols
and their conditions.

@node Cleanups
@subsection Cleaning Up from Nonlocal Exits

  The @code{unwind-protect} construct is essential whenever you
temporarily put a data structure in an inconsistent state; it permits
you to ensure the data are consistent in the event of an error or throw.

@defspec unwind-protect body cleanup-forms@dots{}
@cindex cleanup forms
@cindex protected forms
@cindex error cleanup
@cindex unwinding
@code{unwind-protect} executes the @var{body} with a guarantee that the
@var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated if control leaves @var{body}, no
matter how that happens.  The @var{body} may complete normally, or
execute a @code{throw} out of the @code{unwind-protect}, or cause an
error; in all cases, the @var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated.

Only the @var{body} is actually protected by the @code{unwind-protect}.
If any of the @var{cleanup-forms} themselves exit nonlocally (e.g., via
a @code{throw} or an error), it is @emph{not} guaranteed that the rest
of them will be executed.  If the failure of one of the
@var{cleanup-forms} has the potential to cause trouble, then it should
be protected by another @code{unwind-protect} around that form.

The number of currently active @code{unwind-protect} forms counts,
together with the number of local variable bindings, against the limit
@code{max-specpdl-size} (@pxref{Local Variables}).
@end defspec

  For example, here we make an invisible buffer for temporary use, and
make sure to kill it before finishing:

@smallexample
@group
(save-excursion
  (let ((buffer (get-buffer-create " *temp*")))
    (set-buffer buffer)
    (unwind-protect
        @var{body}
      (kill-buffer buffer))))
@end group
@end smallexample

@noindent
You might think that we could just as well write @code{(kill-buffer
(current-buffer))} and dispense with the variable @code{buffer}.
However, the way shown above is safer, if @var{body} happens to get an
error after switching to a different buffer!  (Alternatively, you could
write another @code{save-excursion} around the body, to ensure that the
temporary buffer becomes current in time to kill it.)

@findex ftp-login
  Here is an actual example taken from the file @file{ftp.el}.  It creates
a process (@pxref{Processes}) to try to establish a connection to a remote
machine.  As the function @code{ftp-login} is highly susceptible to
numerous problems which the writer of the function cannot anticipate, it is
protected with a form that guarantees deletion of the process in the event
of failure.  Otherwise, XEmacs might fill up with useless subprocesses.

@smallexample
@group
(let ((win nil))
  (unwind-protect
      (progn
        (setq process (ftp-setup-buffer host file))
        (if (setq win (ftp-login process host user password))
            (message "Logged in")
          (error "Ftp login failed")))
    (or win (and process (delete-process process)))))
@end group
@end smallexample

  This example actually has a small bug: if the user types @kbd{C-g} to
quit, and the quit happens immediately after the function
@code{ftp-setup-buffer} returns but before the variable @code{process} is
set, the process will not be killed.  There is no easy way to fix this bug,
but at least it is very unlikely.
