Internet-Draft BGP-SPF SRv6 July 2025
Zhang, et al. Expires 8 January 2026 [Page]
Workgroup:
LSVR
Internet-Draft:
draft-li-lsvr-bgp-spf-srv6-02
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
L. Zhang
Huawei Technologies
J. Dong
Huawei Technologies
K. Patel
Arrcus, Inc.

Applying BGP-LS Segment Routing over IPv6(SRv6) Extensions to BGP-LS-SPF

Abstract

For network scenarios such as Massively Scaled Data Centers (MSDCs), BGP is extended for Link-State (LS) distribution and the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm based calculation. BGP-LS-SPF leverages the mechanisms of both BGP protocol and BGP-LS protocol extensions. Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) provides a source routing mechanism that allows a flow to be restricted to a specific topological path, while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node(s) to the SRv6 domain. In some networks, it may be useful to enable SRv6 based source routing mechanism together with BGP-LS-SPF. This document proposes to introduce the BGP Link-State (BGP-LS) extensions for SRv6 to the BGP-LS-SPF SAFI.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 8 January 2026.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

[I-D.ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf] extends BGP for Link-State (LS) distribution and the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm based calculation. BGP-LS-SPF leverages the mechanisms of both BGP protocol [RFC4271] and BGP-LS protocol extensions [RFC9552], with the extensions to BGP-LS attribute and new NLRI selection rules.

Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within various topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological or functional sub-paths called "segments". SRv6 provides a mechanism that allows a flow to be restricted to a specific topological path, while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node(s) to the SRv6 domain.

In network scenarios such as Data Center networks, WAN networks or other networks where BGP-LS-SPF can be used as the underlay routing protocol, it may be useful to enable SRv6 based source routing mechanism for traffic engineering and optimization. This document proposes to introduce the BGP Link-State (BGP-LS) extensions for SRv6 to the BGP-LS-SPF SAFI, and discusses which SRv6 extensions can be applied to BGP-LS-SPF SAFI.

1.1. Requirements Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

2. SRv6 Node Attribute TLVs

Based on [RFC9514], the following SRv6 Node Attributes TLV SHOULD be supported in BGP-LS-SPF.

Table 1: Node Attribute TLVs for SRv6 with BGP-LS-SPF
Type Description Reference
1138 SRv6 Capabilities TLV RFC 9514
266 Node MSD TLV RFC 8814
1035 SR Algorithm TLV RFC 9085

These SRv6 Node Attributes TLVs are advertised associated with the BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.

2.1. SRv6 Capabilities TLV

The SRv6 Capabilities TLV defined in [RFC9514] is used to announce the SRv6 capabilities of the node along with the BGP-LS Node NLRI and indicates the SRv6 support by the node.

For BGP-LS-SPF, it SHOULD support this TLV for a BGP-LS-SPF node to advertise its support for the SRv6-related capabilities. This is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI that MUST be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.

This TLV MUST be advertised only once in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI. When multiple SRv6 Capabilities TLVs are received from a given node, the receiver MUST use the first occurrence of the TLV in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.

If no SRv6 Capabilities TLV is advertised in the BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI, then it indicates that the originator of this NLRI does not support SRv6.

The format and flags of SRv6 Capabilities TLV of BGP-LS-SPF is consistent with that in BGP-LS. The format of BGP-LS-SPF SRv6 Capability TLV is shown as follow:

 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|             Flags             |            Reserved           |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: SRv6 Capability TLV format

where:

Type: 1038

Length: 4

Flags: 2-octet field. the following flags are defined:

0                   1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |O|       Reserved            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

where:

O-flag: If set, the node supports use of the O-bit in the SRH, as defined in [RFC9259].

Other flags are not defined and are reserved for future use. They MUST be set to 0 on transmission and MUST be ignored on receipt.

Reserved: 2-octet field that MUST be set to 0 when originated and ignored on receipt.

2.2. SRv6 Node MSD Types

The Node MSD TLV defined in [RFC8814] is used to advertise the limits and the Segment Routing Header (SRH) operations supported by the SRv6-capable node in BGP-LS.

For BGP-LS-SPF, different SRv6-capable node may have different limits related to SRH processing, therefore, BGP-LS-SPF SHOULD support this TLV for nodes to advertise the limits and operations.

The SRv6 Node MSD TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Node Attribute in BGP-LS-SPF NLRI that MAY be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.

This TLV MUST be advertised only once in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI. When multiple SRv6 Node MSD TLVs are received from a given node, the receiver MUST use the first occurrence of the TLV in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.

The MSD types for SRv6 that are defined in Section 4 of [RFC9352] for IS-IS are also used by BGP-LS-SPF. These MSD types are allocated in the "IGP MSD-Types" registry maintained by IANA and are shared by IS-IS, OSPF, and BGP-LS-SPF. They are described in the subsections below.

The format of this TLV is the same as that in BGP-LS:

   0                   1                   2                   3
   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |              Type             |             Length            |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
  |    MSD-Type   |  MSD-Value    |  MSD-Type...  |  MSD-Value... |
  +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Figure 2: SRv6 Node MSD TLV format

where:

Type: 266.

Length: variable, represents the total length of the value field in octets.

Value: consists of one or more pairs of a 1-octet MSD-Type and 1-octet MSD-Value. The detail description of MSD-Type and MSD-Value is in Section 3 of [RFC8814].

Node MSD is the smallest MSD supported by the node on the set of interfaces configured for use by the advertising BGP-LS-SPF instance. MSD values may be learned via a hardware API or may be provisioned.

If there are multiple MSD-Types that have the same code point in a Node MSD TLV, then the Node MSD TLV MUST be ignored by the receiver.

2.2.1. Maximum Segments Left MSD Type

The Maximum Segments Left MSD Type signals the maximum value of the Segments Left field in the SRH of a received packet before applying the Endpoint behavior associated with a SID.

If no value is advertised, the supported value is assumed to be 0.

2.2.2. Maximum End Pop MSD Type

The Maximum End Pop MSD Type signals the maximum number of SIDs in the SRH to which the node can apply "Penultimate Segment Pop (PSP) of the SRH" or "Ultimate Segment Pop (USP) of the SRH" behaviors, which defined in Section 4.16 of [RFC8986].

If the advertised value is zero or no value is advertised, then the node cannot apply the PSP or USP flavors.

2.2.3. Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type

The Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type signals the maximum number of SIDs that can be added as part of the H.Encaps behavior as defined in [RFC8986].

If the advertised value is zero or no value is advertised, then the headend can apply an SR Policy that only contains one segment without inserting any SRH.

A non-zero SRH Max H.Encaps MSD indicates that the headend can insert an SRH with SIDs up to the advertised value.

2.2.4. Maximum End D MSD Type

The Maximum End D MSD Type specifies the maximum number of SIDs present in an SRH when performing decapsulation. These include, but are not limited to, End.DX6, End.DT4, End.DT46, End with USD, and End.X with USD as defined in [RFC8986].

If the advertised value is zero or no value is advertised, then the node cannot apply any behavior that results in decapsulation and forwarding of the inner packet when the outer IPv6 header contains an SRH.

2.3. SR-Algorithm TLV

[RFC9514] specifies that the algorithm support for SRv6 is advertised via the SR-Algorithm TLV specified in [RFC9085]. The SR-Algorithm is used to advertise the SR algorithms supported by the node.

This TLV is a basic TLV of SR and SHOULD be supported in BGP-LS-SPF. The SR-Algorithm TLV is an optional TLV of BGP-LS-SPF Node Attribute in BGP-LS-SPF NLRI that MAY be advertised by an SRv6-capable node.

This TLV MUST be advertised only once in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI. If a node receiving multiple SR-Algorithm TLVs in the BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI, the receiver MUST use the first occurrence of the TLV in the attributes of BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI.

If a SRv6-capable node does not advertise the SR-Algorithm TLV, it implies that algorithm 0 is the only algorithm supported by the node.

If the originating node does advertise the SR-Algorithm sub-TLV, then algorithm 0 MUST be present while non-zero algorithms MAY be present.

The format of Algorithm fields in this TLV is consistent with that in BGP-LS, as defined in Section 2.1.3 of [RFC9085].

  0                   1                   2                   3
  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |   Type        |     Length    |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 | Algorithm 1   |  Algorithm 2  | Algorithm ... |  Algorithm n  |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Figure 3: SRv6 Algorithm TLV format

where:

Type: 1035

Length: Variable

Algorithm: 1 octet of algorithm.

The algorithm values are allocated in the "IGP Algorithm Type" registry defined in [RFC8665], these values are shared by IS-IS, OSPF, and BGP-LS-SPF.

4. SRv6 Prefix Attribute TLVs

Based on [RFC9514], the BGP-LS SRv6 Prefix Attributes only includes the SRv6 Locator TLV. This TLV SHOULD be supported by BGP-LS-SPF.

Table 3: Prefix Attribute TLVs for SRv6 with BGP-LS-SPF
Type Description Reference
1162 SRv6 Locator TLV RFC 9514

These SRv6 Prefix Attribute TLVs are advertised associated with the BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI.

4.1. SRv6 Locator TLV

The SRv6 Locator TLV defined in [RFC9514] is used to advertise the locators supported by each node. Locator is the key component of SRv6 SID, BGP-LS-SPF SHOULD support this TLV to enable segment routing.

A node is provisioned with one or more locators supported by that node. Locators are covering prefixes for the set of SIDs provisioned on that node. Each locator is advertised as a BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI object along with the SRv6 Locator TLV in its BGP-LS-SPF Attribute.

Multiple SRv6 Locator TLVs MAY be advertised in each BGP-LS-SPF Prefix NLRI. Each locator is advertised in a SRv6 Locator TLV.

When multiple SRv6 Locator TLVs are received from a given node in an BGP-LS-SPF prefix NLRI for the same locator, the receiver MUST use the first occurrence of the TLV in the NLRI.

The format of the SRv6 Locator TLV is the same as BGP-LSSection 5.1 of [RFC9514].

 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|      Flags    |   Algorithm   |           Reserved            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                            Metric                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|   Sub-TLVs (variable) . . .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Figure 6: SRv6 Locator TLV format

where:

Type: 1162

Length: variable

Flags: 1 octet of flags. Currently, the flags field is not used and MUST be set to zero on transmission and MUST be ignored on receipt.

Algorithm: 1-octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID, as defined in the "IGP Algorithm Types" registry [RFC8665].

Reserved: 2-octet field. The value MUST be set to 0 when originated and ignored on receipt.

Metric: 4-octet field. The value of the metric for the locator.

Sub-TLVs: Used to advertise sub-TLVs that provide additional attributes for the given SRv6 Locator. Currently, none are defined.

Since BGP-LS-SPF defines the Prefix Metric TLV is mandatory for Prefix NLRI, so the Metric field in this TLV is no longer usable. It SHOULD be set to 0 and MUST be ignored on receipt.

5. SRv6 SID NLRI

The SRv6 SID NLRI defined in [RFC9514] is used to carry the SRv6 SID information. When SRv6 SIDs need to be advertised in BGP-SPF, the following NLRI type and attributes TLV for SRv6 SID SHOULD be supported in BGP-LS-SPF SAFI:

Table 4: SRv6 SID NLRI with BGP-LS-SPF
Type NLRI Type Reference
6 SRv6 SID NLRI RFC 9514
518 SRv6 SID Information TLV RFC 9514
1250 SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV RFC 9514

The format of SRv6 SID NLRI is the same as that in BGP-LSSection 6 of [RFC9514].

An SRv6-enabled node SHOULD advertise at least one SRv6 SID associated with an End behavior encapsulated in the SRv6 NLRI for itself as specified in [RFC8986].

An SRv6-enabled node MAY advertise multiple instances of the SRv6 SID NLRI -- one for each of the SRv6 SIDs to be advertised.

5.1. SRv6 SID Information TLV

The SRv6 SID Information TLV is used to carry the SRv6 SID that do not require a particular neighbor in a SRv6 SID NLRI. This TLV SHOULD be supported in BGP-LS-SPF to advertise SRv6 SIDs of each node.

SRv6 SID Information TLV is a mandatory TLV in SRv6 NLRI. For each SRv6 SID NLRI, it MUST contain a single SRv6 SID Information TLV.

When multiple SRv6 SID Information TLVs are received from a given node in an BGP-LS-SPF SRv6 SID NLRI for the same SID, the receiver MUST use the first occurrence of the TLV in the NLRI.

The format of SRv6 SID Information TLV is the same as that in BGP-LSSection 6.1 of [RFC9514].

 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (16 octets) ...                                        |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    SID (cont ...)                                             |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Figure 7: SRv6 SID Information TLV format

where:

Type: 518

Length: 16

SID: 16-octet field. This field encodes the advertised SRv6 SID as a 128-bit value.

The SRv6 SID MUST be allocated from its associated locator. SRv6 SIDs that are NOT allocated from the associated locator MUST be ignored.

5.2. SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV

The Endpoint Behavior TLV defined in [RFC9514] is used to advertise the behaviors associated with a SID. The BGP-LS-SPF SHOULD support this TLV to enable the advertisement of behaviors associated with a SRv6 SID.

The SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV is a mandatory TLV that MUST be included once in the BGP-LS Attribute associated with the BGP-LS-SPF SRv6 SID NLRI.

When multiple SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLVs are received from a given node in an BGP-LS-SPF SRv6 SID NLRI, the receiver MUST use the first occurrence of the TLV in the NLRI.

The format of SRv6 Endpoint is the same as that in BGP-LS.

 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|        Endpoint Behavior      |      Flags    |   Algorithm   |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Figure 8: SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV format

Where:

Type: 1250

Length: 4

Endpoint Behavior: 2-octet field. The Endpoint behavior code point for this SRv6 SID.

Flags: 1 octet of flags. No flags are currently defined, and this field MUST be set to 0 on transmission and MUST be ignored on receipt.

Algorithm: 1-octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID.

Supported behavior values for this TLV are defined in Section 7 of this document. Unsupported or unrecognized behavior values are ignored by the receiver.

6. SRv6 SID Structure TLV

The SRv6 SID Structure TLV defined in [RFC9514] is used to advertise the length of each individual part of the SRv6 SID as defined in [RFC8986]. BGP-LS-SPF MAY support this TLV to indicate the length of each individual part of the SRv6 SID of BGP-LS-SPF, which is useful in some scenarios using compressed SID.

It is an optional TLV that MAY be use in the BGP-LS-SPF SRv6 SID NLRI and SRv6 End.X SID TLV.

The SRv6 SID Structure TLV MUST NOT appear more than once in its parent TLV or NLRI. If it appears more than once in its parent TLV or NLRI, the parent TLV or NLRI MUST be ignored by the receiver.

The format of SRv6 Structure TLV is the same as that in BGP-LS.

 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|               Type            |          Length               |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|    LB Length  |  LN Length    | Fun. Length   |  Arg. Length  |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Figure 9: SRv6 SID Structure TLV format

where:

Type: 1252

Length: 4

LB Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Locator Block length in bits.

LN Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Locator Node length in bits.

Fun. Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Function length in bits.

Arg. Length: 1-octet field. SRv6 SID Argument length in bits.

The sum of all four sizes advertised in SRv6 SID Structure TLV MUST be less than or equal to 128 bits. If the sum of all four sizes advertised in the SRv6 SID Structure sub-TLV is larger than 128 bits, the parent TLV or NLRI MUST be ignored by the receiver.

The SRv6 SID Structure sub-TLV is intended for informational use by the control and management planes. It MUST NOT be used at a transit node (as defined in [RFC8754]) for forwarding packets. The typical use cases for this information are described in the Section 10 of [RFC9513] and Section 9 of [RFC9352].

7. Advertsing Endpoint Behaviors

Endpoint behaviors are defined in [RFC8986]. The code points for the Endpoint behaviors are defined in the "SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors" registry of [RFC8986]. This section lists the Endpoint behaviors and their code points, which MAY be advertised by BGP-LS-SPF and the TLVs in which each type MAY appear.

Table 5: SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors in BGP-LS-SPF
Endpoint Behavior Endpoint Behavior Code Point Endpoint Behavoir End.X SID
End(PSP, USP, USD) 1-4, 28-31 Y N
End.X(PSP, USP, USD) 5-8, 32-35 N Y

8. Security Considerations

This document introduces no additional security vulnerabilities in addition to the ones as described in [RFC9552].

9. IANA Considerations

This document has no IANA actions.

10. Acknowledgements

This document refers extensively to the content of [RFC9514], [RFC9513], [RFC9352], and [RFC9085]. The authors would like to thank the authors of these RFCs, they are James Uttaro, Hani Elmalky, Arjun Sreekantiah, Les Ginsberg, Shunwan Zhuang, Zhenbin Li, Zhibo Hu, Ketan Talaulikar, Peter Psenak, Clarence Filsfils, Ahmed Bashandy, Bruno Decraene, Stefano Previdi, Hannes Gredler, and Mach(Guoyi) Chen.

The authors also would like to thank Acee Lindem for his valuable comments and suggestions.

11. References

11.1. Normative References

[I-D.ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf]
Patel, K., Lindem, A., Zandi, S., and W. Henderickx, "BGP Link-State Shortest Path First (SPF) Routing", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-51, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-51>.
[RFC4271]
Rekhter, Y., Ed., Li, T., Ed., and S. Hares, Ed., "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, DOI 10.17487/RFC4271, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4271>.
[RFC9552]
Talaulikar, K., Ed., "Distribution of Link-State and Traffic Engineering Information Using BGP", RFC 9552, DOI 10.17487/RFC9552, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9552>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC9514]
Dawra, G., Filsfils, C., Talaulikar, K., Ed., Chen, M., Bernier, D., and B. Decraene, "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)", RFC 9514, DOI 10.17487/RFC9514, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9514>.
[RFC8814]
Tantsura, J., Chunduri, U., Talaulikar, K., Mirsky, G., and N. Triantafillis, "Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Using the Border Gateway Protocol - Link State", RFC 8814, DOI 10.17487/RFC8814, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8814>.
[RFC9352]
Psenak, P., Ed., Filsfils, C., Bashandy, A., Decraene, B., and Z. Hu, "IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing over the IPv6 Data Plane", RFC 9352, DOI 10.17487/RFC9352, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9352>.
[RFC9085]
Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Ed., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., and M. Chen, "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing", RFC 9085, DOI 10.17487/RFC9085, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9085>.
[RFC9513]
Li, Z., Hu, Z., Talaulikar, K., Ed., and P. Psenak, "OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)", RFC 9513, DOI 10.17487/RFC9513, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9513>.

11.2. Informative References

[RFC9259]
Ali, Z., Filsfils, C., Matsushima, S., Voyer, D., and M. Chen, "Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) in Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)", RFC 9259, DOI 10.17487/RFC9259, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9259>.
[RFC8986]
Filsfils, C., Ed., Camarillo, P., Ed., Leddy, J., Voyer, D., Matsushima, S., and Z. Li, "Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) Network Programming", RFC 8986, DOI 10.17487/RFC8986, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8986>.
[RFC8665]
Psenak, P., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., Shakir, R., Henderickx, W., and J. Tantsura, "OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing", RFC 8665, DOI 10.17487/RFC8665, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8665>.
[RFC9086]
Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Ed., Filsfils, C., Patel, K., Ray, S., and J. Dong, "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing BGP Egress Peer Engineering", RFC 9086, DOI 10.17487/RFC9086, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9086>.
[RFC8402]
Filsfils, C., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Ginsberg, L., Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing Architecture", RFC 8402, DOI 10.17487/RFC8402, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8402>.
[RFC4202]
Kompella, K., Ed. and Y. Rekhter, Ed., "Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)", RFC 4202, DOI 10.17487/RFC4202, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4202>.
[RFC8754]
Filsfils, C., Ed., Dukes, D., Ed., Previdi, S., Leddy, J., Matsushima, S., and D. Voyer, "IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)", RFC 8754, DOI 10.17487/RFC8754, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8754>.

Authors' Addresses

Li Zhang
Huawei Technologies
No. 156 Beiqing Road
Beijing
China
Jie Dong
Huawei Technologies
No. 156 Beiqing Road
Beijing
China
Keyur Patel
Arrcus, Inc.