Network Working Group J. Gould Internet-Draft VeriSign, Inc. Intended status: Standards Track 28 July 2025 Expires: 29 January 2026 Balance Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) draft-gould-regext-balance-00 Abstract This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) mapping for retrieving the client balance and other financial information. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 29 January 2026. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Gould Expires 29 January 2026 [Page 1] Internet-Draft balance July 2025 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Object Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. Decimal Attribute Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2. Dates and Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.3. Low Balance Poll Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. EPP Command Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.1. EPP Query Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.1.1. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.1.2. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1.3. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2. EPP Transform Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2.1. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2.2. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2.3. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2.4. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2.5. EPP Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4. Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 4.1. Balance Mapping Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.1. XML Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5.2. EPP Extension Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 7. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 8. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1. Introduction This document describes an extension mapping for version 1.0 of the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) [RFC5730]. This EPP mapping enables a client to get their financial information including the balance, credit limit, available credit, and credit threshold. 1.1. Conventions Used in This Document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. XML is case sensitive. Unless stated otherwise, XML specifications and examples provided in this document MUST be interpreted in the character case presented in order to develop a conforming implementation. Gould Expires 29 January 2026 [Page 2] Internet-Draft balance July 2025 In examples, "C:" represents lines sent by a protocol client and "S:" represents lines returned by a protocol server. In examples, indentation and whitespace are provided only to illustrate element relationships and are not a required feature of this protocol. "balance-0.1" is used as an abbreviation for "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:balance-0.1". The XML namespace prefix "balance" is used, but implementations MUST NOT depend on it. Instead, they are to employ a proper namespace-aware XML parser and serializer to interpret and output the XML documents. 2. Object Attributes 2.1. Decimal Attribute Values All of the EPP Balance currency object attributes use the XML decimal (http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/#decimal) data type to represent the currency value in the currency of the server. The precision is restricted to 2 fractional digits. 2.2. Dates and Times Date and time attribute values MUST be represented in Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) using the Gregorian calendar. The extended date-time form using upper case "T" and "Z" characters defined in XML Schema Part 2 (http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/) MUST be used to represent date-time values, as XML Schema does not support truncated date-time forms or lower case "T" and "Z" characters. 2.3. Low Balance Poll Message The EPP command and response is defined in section 2.9.2.3 of [RFC5730]. For servers that support a credit threshold, the Balance Info Response, as defined in Section 3.1.2, is inserted into the poll queue whenever the available credit for an account reaches or goes below the credit threshold. Example command: C: C: C: C: C: ABC-12345 C: C: Gould Expires 29 January 2026 [Page 3] Internet-Draft balance July 2025 Example low balance response: Command completed successfully; ack to dequeue 2020-09-01T15:25:01.0078Z Low Account Balance USD 1000.00 800.00 200.00 500.00 ABC-12345 54322-XYZ 3. EPP Command Mapping A detailed description of the EPP syntax and semantics can be found in the EPP core protocol specification [RFC5730]. The command mappings described here are specifically for use with the Balance Object Mapping. 3.1. EPP Query Commands EPP [RFC5730] provides three commands to retrieve object information: to determine if an object is known to the server, to retrieve detailed information associated with an object, and to retrieve object transfer status information. 3.1.1. EPP Command Available check semantics do not apply to balance objects, so there is no mapping defined for the EPP command. Gould Expires 29 January 2026 [Page 4] Internet-Draft balance July 2025 3.1.2. EPP Command EPP provides the command that is used to retrieve client balance and other financial information for the currently logged-in client. In addition to the standard EPP command elements, the command MUST contain a element that identifies the balance namespace. The element does not contain any child elements. Example command: C: C: C: C: C: C: C: ABC-12345 C: C: When an command has been processed successfully, the EPP element MUST contain a child element that identifies the balance namespace. The element contains the following child elements: The element is used to indicate the currency used by the account balance elements. The value of this element MUST be a three- character currency code from [ISO4217_2015]. The element contains the account credit limit using the element currency. The element contains the account balance using the element currency. The element that contains the account available credit using the element currency. The available credit is calculated by subtracting the element value from the element value. The OPTIONAL element that contains the low available credit fixed amount threshold, using the element currency. The element MAY be included in a response Gould Expires 29 January 2026 [Page 5] Internet-Draft balance July 2025 to an command and SHOULD be included in a Low Balance Poll Message (as described in Section 2.3), since the element is only relevant for the triggering of the Low Balance Poll Message. Example response response: S: S: S: S: S: Command completed successfully S: S: S: S: USD S: 1000.00 S: 200.00 S: 800.00 S: 500.00 S: S: S: S: ABC-12345 S: 54322-XYZ S: S: S: 3.1.3. EPP Command Transfer semantics do not apply to balance objects, so there is no mapping defined for the EPP command. 3.2. EPP Transform Commands EPP provides five commands to transform objects: to create an instance of an object, to delete an instance of an object, to extend the validity period of an object, to manage object sponsorship changes, and to change information associated with an object. 3.2.1. EPP Command Create semantics do not apply to balance objects, so there is no mapping defined for the EPP command. Gould Expires 29 January 2026 [Page 6] Internet-Draft balance July 2025 3.2.2. EPP Command Delete semantics do not apply to balance objects, so there is no mapping defined for the EPP command. 3.2.3. EPP Command Renew semantics do not apply to balance objects, so there is no mapping defined for the EPP command. 3.2.4. EPP Command Transfer semantics do not apply to balance objects, so there is no mapping defined for the EPP command. 3.2.5. EPP Command Update semantics do not apply to balance objects, so there is no mapping defined for the EPP command. 4. Formal Syntax The EPP Balance Mapping schema is presented here. The formal syntax shown here is a complete XML Schema representation of the object mapping suitable for automated validation of EPP XML instances. The and tags are not part of the XML Schema; they are used to note the beginning and ending of the XML Schema for URI registration purposes. 4.1. Balance Mapping Schema Extensible Provisioning Protocol v1.0 Account balance and other financial information mapping. Gould Expires 29 January 2026 [Page 7] Internet-Draft balance July 2025 5. IANA Considerations 5.1. XML Namespace This document uses URNs to describe XML namespaces and XML schemas conforming to a registry mechanism described in [RFC3688]. The following URI assignment has been made by IANA: Registration request for the balance namespace: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:epp:balance-0.1 Registrant Contact: IESG XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML specification. Gould Expires 29 January 2026 [Page 8] Internet-Draft balance July 2025 Registration request for the balance XML Schema: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:epp:balance-0.1 Registrant Contact: IESG XML: See the "Formal Syntax" section of this document. 5.2. EPP Extension Registry The EPP extension described in this document has been registered by IANA in the "Extensions for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)" registry described in [RFC7451]. The details of the registration are as follows: Name of Extension: "Balance Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)" Document Status: Standards Track Reference: (insert reference to RFC version of this document) Registrant Name and Email Address: IESG, TLDs: Any IPR Disclosure: None Status: Active Notes: None 6. Security Considerations The mapping extensions described in this document do not provide any security services beyond those described by EPP [RFC5730] and protocol layers used by EPP. The security considerations described in these other specifications apply to this specification as well. Financial information is confidential information for a client, so the server MUST have access control restrictions in place to limit access to financial information of the currently logged-in client. 7. Normative References [ISO4217_2015] ISO, "Codes for the representation of currencies", ISO 4217:2015, August 2015, . [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . Gould Expires 29 January 2026 [Page 9] Internet-Draft balance July 2025 [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC5730] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)", STD 69, RFC 5730, DOI 10.17487/RFC5730, August 2009, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . 8. Informative References [RFC7451] Hollenbeck, S., "Extension Registry for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol", RFC 7451, DOI 10.17487/RFC7451, February 2015, . Author's Address James Gould VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 United States of America Email: jgould@verisign.com URI: http://www.verisign.com Gould Expires 29 January 2026 [Page 10]