Internet-Draft | transport network level use cases | July 2025 |
Chen, et al. | Expires 8 January 2026 | [Page] |
With the continuous growth of business volume, the transmission rate and number of network elements have increased sharply, and energy consumption of transport network has increased accordingly. Rising power costs due to significant energy consumption in transport networks necessitate energy-saving measures. To address this, adjusting energy consumption strategies according to different service requirements to optimize efficiency, ensuring quality while eliminating waste. Furthermore, regular network optimization and energy efficiency assessments enhance equipment performance and extend lifespan, thereby controlling long-term operational costs. Integrating energy-saving concepts into transport network operations proactively supports sustainable development.¶
This document presents two transport network level GREEN use cases, aiming to facilitate discussions within the GREEN Working Group on the potential benefits, challenges, and requirements. The use cases follow a structured template that is proposed for all GREEN use cases, ensuring consistency and comparability across different scenarios.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 8 January 2026.¶
Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
The transport network consists of numerous transport network elements, whose architecture directly affects energy consumption and network performance. Meanwhile, different traffic patterns lead to varying network element loads. The traffic model guides dynamic adjustments of network element operations to optimize energy utilization, ensuring that energy consumption scales proportionally with actual traffic demands, thereby achieving efficient energy saving.¶
On the one hand, regularly network optimization and conducting energy efficiency assessments and optimization can enhance equipment performance and extend their lifespan, thereby effectively controlling costs in long-term operations. Against the backdrop of increasingly tight energy resources and stricter environmental requirements, integrating energy-saving concepts into the operation of transport network is not only a factor in reducing operating costs but also a proactive response to the sustainable development.¶
On the other hand, as services continue to be assured in the transport network, the energy consumption of equipment accumulates over time, which significantly impacts operating costs in the long run. Through refined energy-saving strategies, energy efficiency can be optimized without compromising service quality. By employing intelligent traffic management to dynamically adjust the energy consumption of equipment based on dynamic service demands, not only can the efficient transport services be assured, but unnecessary energy waste can also be avoided.¶
This document presents two use cases related to transport network, aiming to facilitate discussions within the GREEN Working Group on the potential benefits, challenges, and requirements. The use cases follow a structured template that is proposed for all GREEN use cases [I-D.stephan-green-use-cases], ensuring consistency and comparability across different scenarios.¶
The transport network consists of numerous devices, and its planning directly affects energy consumption and network performance. Different traffic patterns lead to differences in device loads, and from the perspective of the entire network, traffic is unevenly distributed. Therefore, it's crucial to develop a comprehensive network-level energy optimization strategy in view of dynamic traffic patterns and device capabilities in transport network.¶
This use case focuses on mid-to-long-term, strategic network energy efficiency optimization for operators. That is, through traffic prediction, traffic model optimization, traffic scheduling, and adjustment of device operating status, and energy consumption is positively correlated with actual traffic demand, thereby achieving load balancing and resource utilization optimization, improving the energy-saving potential of network elements, and achieving efficient energy saving.¶
+---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Transport Network Controller | | | | Traffic Prediction -> Network Optimization -> Evaluation | +---------------------------------------------------------------+ ^ | | | Monitoring Energy-Saving Strategy | | | v +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | | | Transport Network Element | | | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
As shown in the figure above, network-level GREEN is located on the controller for centralized policy generation and global scheduling, and the network elements perform specific energy-saving operations at the local.¶
First, network-level traffic prediction is performed based on historical traffic data obtained from the network. The transport network elements process the original per-second measurement data and aggregates it into 15-minute time intervals to report to the controller.¶
Secondly, based on the traffic monitoring from network elements, the controller captures the long-term regularity and short-term burst characteristics of network-level traffic through the neural network model in advance. The traffic prediction model embedded in the controller generates updated predictions to achieve near real-time perception. Based on the traffic load prediction results, the controller identifies high-load network elements (NEs) and idle NEs. The controller then formulates energy-saving traffic migration network optimization strategies.¶
Finally, by migrating traffic from high-load NEs to idle NEs, some switching resources of high-load NEs can be released to enter a dormant state, saving power consumption; while idle NEs can carry more traffic with the support of the existing switching matrix without increasing power consumption, thereby reducing the overall energy consumption of the transport network.¶
Network Level Monitoring¶
Centralized Strategy Generation and Global Scheduling¶
The transport network handles massive optical signals and fabric switching, which requires high bandwidth and low latency, and also incurs significant energy consumption. In order to efficiently manage the transport network, it's necessary to integrate energy saving factors into service assurance. This use case aims to achieve differentiated energy saving without affecting the quality of service. Specifically, services with general service quality requirements try to use low-power devices and links; services with high service quality requirements use relatively safe energy-saving strategies to reduce power consumption while maintaining service requirements.¶
In the field trial involving 1966 commercial network elements traffic data prediction, the network-level optimization strategy provides a power reduction of 7.7% for the whole network and up to 20.8% for the single network element node with service quality guaranteed. This document fully verifies the potential of network-level energy-saving technology, demonstrating an effective approach for sustainable large-scale transport network operations.¶
A general principle is that the more significant the energy savings, the slower the module response time and the longer the wake-up delay, which may impact service performance.¶
To address this, the following items should be considered:¶
So redundant resources should be reserved to accommodate scenarios like protection switching at failure cases. This guarantees service reliability while maintaining energy-saving benefits.¶
TBD.¶