Internet-Draft Abbreviated Title February 2025
Melnikov Expires 25 August 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
Network Working Group
Internet-Draft:
draft-melnikov-smtp-iana-cleanup-00
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Author:
A. Melnikov
Isode Ltd

Updates to SMTP related IANA registries

Abstract

While EMAILCORE working group was working on update to SMTP specification, it became clear that existing SMTP related registries need to be restructured and existing entries need to be updated. This document describes these tasks.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 25 August 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

While EMAILCORE working group was working on update to SMTP specification [I-D.ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis], it became clear that existing SMTP related registries need to be restructured and some existing entries need to be updated. This document describes these tasks, assuming IANA actions specified in [I-D.ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis] were already performed.

2. Conventions Used in This Document

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. IANA Considerations

3.1. Updates to the "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) Service Extensions" registry

Updates to the "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) Service Extensions" registry are described as an ordered list of steps that should be performed sequentually. Each step is described by a subsection of this section.

3.1.1. Updates to the "References" field

IANA is requested to change values of the "References" field for "EXPN" and "HELP" extensions to [I-D.ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis]. The "References" field values for "SEND", "SOML", "SAML" and "TURN" remain unchanged, as they were obsoleted and there are no newer reference than RFC 821.

3.1.2. Updates to the "EHLO Parameters" field

IANA is requested to update the following values in this field:

  1. The value corresponding to the DELIVERBY extension should be changed to "A comma separated list of options (optional)".

  2. The value corresponding to the FUTURERELEASE extension should be changed to "max-future-release-interval and max-future-release-date-time".

  3. The value corresponding to the LIMITS extension should be changed to "List of limits".

3.1.3. Updates to the "Message submission Use and Values" field

IANA is requested to update values corresponding to "HELP", "BURL", "FUTURERELEASE", "SMTPUTF8", "MT-PRIORITY", "RRVS", "REQUIRETLS" and "LIMITS" extensions to "MAY".

3.1.4. Updates to the "Additional verbs", "MAIL/RCPT Parameter Values" fields

IANA is requested to update "Additional verbs" and "MAIL/RCPT Parameter Values" fields as per the table specified below:

Table 1
EHLO Keyword Additional verbs MAIL/RCPT Parameter Values
SEND SEND none
SOML SOML none
SAML SAML none
EXPN EXPN none
HELP HELP none
TURN TURN none
8BITMIME none BODY parameter to MAIL command
SIZE none SIZE parameter to MAIL command
CHUNKING BDAT none
BINARYMIME none BODY parameter to MAIL command (an extra choice was added)
CHECKPOINT none TRANSID parameter to the MAIL command
DELIVERBY none BY parameter to MAIL command
PIPELINING none none
DSN none NOTIFY and ORCPT parameters to RCPT command. RET and ENVID parameters to MAIL command
ETRN ETRN none
ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES none none
STARTTLS STARTTLS none
NO-SOLICITING none SOLICIT parameter to MAIL command
MTRK none MTRK parameters to MAIL command. Also see DSN extension parameters
SUBMITTER none SUBMITTER parameters to MAIL command
ATRN ATRN none
AUTH AUTH AUTH parameter to MAIL command
BURL BURL none
FUTURERELEASE none HOLDFOR and HOLDUNTIL parameters to MAIL command.
UTF8SMTP none One optional parameter, ALT-ADDRESS, is added to the MAIL and RCPT commands
CONPERM none CONPERM parameter to MAIL command
CONNEG none CONNEG parameter to RCPT command
SMTPUTF8 none SMTPUTF8 parameter to the MAIL command
MT-PRIORITY none MT-PRIORITY parameter to MAIL command
RRVS none RRVS parameter to RCPT command
REQUIRETLS none REQUIRETLS parameter to MAIL command
LIMITS none none

TBD: Add and/or calculate "Length Added" values.

4. Security Considerations

This document only specifies IANA related actions, thus it doesn't directly affect security on SMTP or its extensions. However better documentation of SMTP extensions in IANA registries can, hopefully, lead to better and more secure implementations.

5. References

5.1. Normative References

[I-D.ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis]
Klensin, J. C., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis-40, , <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5321bis-40>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

5.2. Informative References

[RFC5321]
Klensin, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", RFC 5321, DOI 10.17487/RFC5321, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5321>.

Author's Address

Alexey Melnikov
Isode Ltd
14 Castle Mews
Hampton
TW12 2NP
United Kingdom