Replied: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 15:01:25 -0500
Replied: "kyle@UU.NET (Kyle Jones) "
Return-Path: kyle@UU.NET 
Received: from a.cs.uiuc.edu (a.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.1]) by spruce.cs.uiuc.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA03442 for <xemacs-m@spruce.cs.uiuc.edu>; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 13:22:33 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from odin.UU.NET (odin.UU.NET [153.39.242.15]) by a.cs.uiuc.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA06524 for <xemacs-m@cs.uiuc.edu>; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 13:22:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from wendy-fate.uu.net by odin.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: wendy-fate.UU.NET [153.39.253.136])
	id QQbcmb09804; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 14:22:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by wendy-fate.uu.net (leaf)
	id QQbcmb01835; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 14:22:21 -0400
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 14:22:21 -0400
Message-Id: <QQbcmb01835.199608121822@wendy-fate.uu.net>
From: kyle@UU.NET (Kyle Jones)
To: XEmacs Mailing Lists Moderator <xemacs-m@cs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Terry Glanfield: Incorrect header lines
In-Reply-To: <199608121648.LAA11683@teak.cs.uiuc.edu>
References: <199608121648.LAA11683@teak.cs.uiuc.edu>

XEmacs Mailing Lists Moderator writes:
 > I noticed this sometime ago as well but forgot to mention it.
 > Is this a problem on UUNET's side?

To, to, TO, and tO are all the same according to RFC 822.
