Replied: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 16:37:12 -0500
Replied: "kyle@UU.NET (Kyle Jones) "
Return-Path: kyle@UU.NET 
Received: from a.cs.uiuc.edu (a.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.1]) by spruce.cs.uiuc.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA03909 for <xemacs-m@spruce.cs.uiuc.edu>; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 15:05:55 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from staypuft.UU.NET (staypuft.UU.NET [153.39.251.9]) by a.cs.uiuc.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA08206 for <xemacs-m@cs.uiuc.edu>; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 15:05:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from wendy-fate.uu.net by staypuft.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: wendy-fate.UU.NET [153.39.253.136])
	id QQbcmi00638; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 16:05:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by wendy-fate.uu.net (leaf)
	id QQbcmi02036; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 16:05:50 -0400
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 16:05:50 -0400
Message-Id: <QQbcmi02036.199608122005@wendy-fate.uu.net>
From: kyle@UU.NET (Kyle Jones)
To: XEmacs Mailing Lists Moderator <xemacs-m@cs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: Terry Glanfield: Incorrect header lines 
In-Reply-To: <199608122001.PAA11777@teak.cs.uiuc.edu>
References: <QQbcmb01835.199608121822@wendy-fate.uu.net>
	<199608122001.PAA11777@teak.cs.uiuc.edu>

 >     Kyle> To, to, TO, and tO are all the same according to RFC 822.
 > 
 > Ah.  Ok.  It was just annoying since I had To and not [Tt]o in my
 > .procmailrc file originally.  Which I fixed quite sometime ago...

BTW, I'm not a troublemaker.  I'm going to change the script anyway,
I can't really blame people for not reading RFC 822.  If I didn't
make my living running mail systems I probably wouldn't have read
it either.
