Subject: Should ld complain about duplicate globals?
Subject: int foo, extern int foo and int foo = 0
Subject: problems with libc version 1112 and ghostscript
Subject: Why is bcopy/bzero/bcmp different for linux in /usr/include/string.h.
Subject: bugs in libc1112 and zip
Subject: Re: Why is bcopy/bzero/bcmp different for linux in /usr/include/string.h.
Subject: Re: Why is bcopy/bzero/bcmp different for linux in /usr/include/string.h.
Subject: new shared image 1119 is on tsx-11
Subject: function --> macro bug.
Subject: 1120 snaphost is on tsx-11
Subject: 1120 snaphost is on tsx-11
Subject: Re: function --> macro bug.
Subject: Re: function --> macro bug.
Subject: Re: 1120 snaphost is on tsx-11
Subject: Re: function --> macro bug.
Subject: function --> macro bug.
Subject: function --> macro bug. (fwd)
Subject: whose library is this, anyway?
Subject: Re: whose library is this, anyway?
Subject: gcc2_compiled already defined
Subject: Re: gcc2_compiled already defined
Subject: gcc2_compiled already defined
Subject: bsd signal() vs usg signal() implementation details
Subject: Re: Why is bcopy/bzero/bcmp different for linux in /usr/include/string.h.
Subject: bsd signal and usg signal
Subject: Re: Why is bcopy/bzero/bcmp different for linux in /usr/include/string.h.
Subject: Re: Why is bcopy/bzero/bcmp different for linux in /usr/include/string.h.
Subject: Re: Why is bcopy/bzero/bcmp different for linux in /usr/include/string.h.
Subject: Re: BSD signal() vs. USG signal()
Subject: Re: Why is bcopy/bzero/bcmp different for linux in /usr/include/string.h.
Subject: gcc (921121) and libc (921123) are on tsx-11 (fwd)
Subject: malloc
Subject: Malloc definition in gcc (ss-921121)
Subject: Re: Why is bcopy/bzero/bcmp different for linux in /usr/include/string.h.
Subject: POSIX and ANSI compliance
Subject: POSIX and ANSI complaince
Subject: Re: POSIX and ANSI complaince
Subject: Re: POSIX and ANSI compliance
Subject: Re: POSIX and ANSI complaince
Subject: Re: Why is bcopy/bzero/bcmp different for linux in /usr/include/string.h.
Subject: fopen ("a device", "a") - should it fail (4.1 libs)
Subject: Re: Bugs in Linux libc 4.2
Subject: Re: Bugs in Linux libc 4.2
Subject: the correct sysd-stdio.c
Subject: 
Subject: minor change for sysd-stdio.c
Subject: Re: fopen ("a device", "a") - should it fail (4.1 libs)
Subject: gcc 2.3.2 is on tsx-11
Subject: libc 4.2 1129 snapshot on tsx-11
Subject: Has linking changed since 2.2.2d?
Subject: X-Mn-Key: gcc
Subject: Re: Newest gcc
Subject: Re: LIBC4.2
Subject: gethostbyname()
Subject: gcc 2.3.2 may be delayed
Subject: Problem with mail and libc
Subject: getc() problem
Subject: Re: Problem with mail and libc
Subject:    Jump shared libraries ??
Subject: Where to get libg.a
Subject: Re: Jump shared libraries ??